Conference article

Study of Fluidization Regimes using OpenFOAM Computational Fluid Dynamics

Prasanna Welahettige
Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University College of Southeast Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway

Bernt Lie
Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University College of Southeast Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway

Knut Vaagsaether
Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University College of Southeast Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway

Britt M.E Moldestad
Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University College of Southeast Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway

Download articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp17138128

Published in: Proceedings of the 58th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 58) Reykjavik, Iceland, September 25th – 27th, 2017

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 138:17, p. 128-136

Show more +

Published: 2017-09-27

ISBN: 978-91-7685-417-4

ISSN: 1650-3686 (print), 1650-3740 (online)

Abstract

The objective of this study was using computational fluid dynamics simulation with OpenFOAM to study the fluidization properties for four types of particles classified as Geldart A, B, C and D. Fluidization regimes were studied for particles with the same density but different diameters. The particle diameters were selected based on Geldart’s classification of particles. The simulation results were validated against experimental data. Pressure gradient, flow regime change, bubble rise, bubble splitting and bed expansion were studied for all four types of particles for different superficial velocities. Group-B and D particles easily produced bubbles. However, Group-C and A particles gave very high bed expansion, and no clear bubbles were observed. Bed with the Group-D particles, the bubbles was large and some of the bubbles reached the diameter of the bed. Group-B particles gave smaller and on average more stable bubbles than Group-D particles. There was no bubble formation from Group-C and Group-A until the inlet superficial velocity was 25 times and 5 times larger, respectively, than their minimum fluidization velocities.

Keywords

Fluidization, bubble, Geldart’s classification, pressure gradient, flow regimes, OpenFOAM

References

No references available

Citations in Crossref