Files:DescriptionFile size FormatBrowse
Fulltext0.16 MBPDF (requires Acrobat Reader)Previous | Next
  
Authors:Iulia Pohrib: Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, France
Publication title:Tradition and Ethnographic Display: Defining the National Specificity at the National Art Museum in Romania (1906–1937)
Conference:Great Narratives of the Past Traditions and Revisions in National Museums: Conference Proceedings from EuNaMus; European National Museums: Identity Politics; the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen; Paris 28 June – 1 July & 25–26 November 2011
Publication type: Abstract and Fulltext
Issue:078
Article No.:020
Abstract:After a long period of debates and several unfinished projects; the National Museum of Romania was founded in 1906. Under the direction of Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcas (1872–1952); the newly created institution aimed at being the expression of the Romanian civilization and a depository of local traditions. It was also intended to be a documentary basis for study and research about Romanian art and culture. This paper aims at analysing first the strategies deployed by its director for the construction of a patrimonial collection; then the way it has become more visible through the selection of the objects; the structure of permanent display and the museographic practices. The project for the Muzeul National developed a complex narrative that mixed antiquities as well as religious; folk and modern art in order to define a national specificity and to support the idea of unity and continuity of the Romanian culture; from prehistorical times to the present. Despite its consequent historicism; Tzigara-Samurcas’ museographic conception nevertheless granted a central role to ethnography in a time when folk art unanimously appeared as an authentic production; the very expression of the ‘Romanian spirit’ and the main source of a new regenerated contemporary art. We intend to explore the relationship between the patrimonial practices developed at the National Museum in Romania and the dynamic and multifaceted concept of ‘specificity’. Finally; we will pay attention to the National Museum exhibitions that took place in Paris during the inter-war period as the promotion of an identity profile that revisited national stereotypes; myths of origin and local authenticity. By considering several critical texts; exhibition catalogues and diverse acquisitions; we will try to understand how the foreign audience pictured Romanian ‘national art’ during this period.
Language:English
Year:2012
No. of pages:20
Pages:317-329
Series:Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):1650-3686
ISSN (online):1650-3740
File:http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/078/020/ecp12078020.pdf
Available:2012-10-30
Publisher:Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet

REFERENCE TO THIS PAGE
Iulia Pohrib (2012). Tradition and Ethnographic Display: Defining the National Specificity at the National Art Museum in Romania (1906–1937), Great Narratives of the Past Traditions and Revisions in National Museums: Conference Proceedings from EuNaMus; European National Museums: Identity Politics; the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen; Paris 28 June – 1 July & 25–26 November 2011 http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=078;article=020 (accessed 10/25/2014)