|Fulltext||1.07 MB||PDF (requires Acrobat Reader)||Previous | Next|
|Authors:||Tony Lawler: Goldsmiths London University, UK|
|Alix McTaminey: King Alfred School, UK|
|Stephen de Brett: King Alfred School, UK|
|Publication title:||Design Mentoring and Designerly Attitudes|
|Conference:||PATT 26 Conference, Technology Education in the 21st Century, Stockholm, Sweden, 26-30 June, 2012|
|Publication type:||Abstract and Fulltext|
|Abstract:||This paper explores the activity of mentoring design and make projects, with the intention of giving mentoring practitioners guidance and confidence in the activity, whilst developing designerly attitudes in their pupils. We as a team were frustrated by how little of this was observed in English secondary Design and Technology lessons, yet were aware that in many cases the teachers had on graduation been accomplished designers. It seems that the prevalent school assessment culture and inexperience of teaching the activity of designing was lowering the priority of ’designing’ within Design and technology lessons. We set out to find out what University Design tutors did in mentoring and through this to establish a framework that we could use in schools with school pupils and their teachers. Our work was observed and aided by a psychotherapist and counselor who helped us to recognise some of the conscious and unconscious dynamics which exist between teachers and pupils in this setting and which can impede or act as a stimulus to the pupils creative output.|
From analysis of a series of interviews we proposed that design mentors seem to have 3 roles
We recorded and observed 12 pupil and teacher mentoring sessions using digital pens and voice recordings. The teachers then used these records to reflect on what they had said and done with the pupils and using the criteria, commented on the roles they were adopting.
The outcomes of this were that the teachers and observers gained a clearer insight into the roles of the project work tutor, and felt that their confidence in their own ability, which had previously been intuitive, was aided by having a structure on which to base their reflections.
This was a very preliminary study, aimed at validating the 3 roles. Having done so, the team believes that through pupils being better engaged in design and making pupil autonomy will be better developed.
The next stage will be to use this structure and approach in a wider range of schools, pupils, and educational contexts.
|Keywords:||Mentoring project-work, Designerly attitudes, Countertransference|
|No. of pages:||12|
|Series:||Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings|
|Publisher:||Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet|
|REFERENCE TO THIS PAGE |