Files:DescriptionFile size FormatBrowse
Fulltext0.54 MBPDF (requires Acrobat Reader)Previous | Next
  
Authors:Philip Nickel: Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Andreas Spahn: Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Publication title:Trust; Discourse Ethics; and Persuasive Technology
Conference:Persuasive Technology: Design for Health and Safety; The 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology; PERSUASIVE 2012; Linköping; Sweden; June 6-8; Adjunct Proceedings
Publication type: Abstract and Fulltext
Issue:068
Article No.:010
Abstract:In this paper we analyze the role trust plays in an ethical evaluation of PT. We distinguish between trust in PT itself; and trust in those humans who design; produce and deploy it and draw on Discourse Ethics to further distinguish two types of communication embodied in PTs: asymmetrical and symmetrical communication.
Language:English
Keywords:Persuasive Technology; Trust; Ethics; Discourse Ethics; Speech Act Theory
Year:2012
No. of pages:4
Pages:37-40
Series:Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):1650-3686
ISSN (online):1650-3740
File:http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/068/010/ecp12068010.pdf
Available:2012-06-06
Publisher:Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet

REFERENCE TO THIS PAGE
Philip Nickel, Andreas Spahn (2012). Trust; Discourse Ethics; and Persuasive Technology, Persuasive Technology: Design for Health and Safety; The 7th International Conference on Persuasive Technology; PERSUASIVE 2012; Linköping; Sweden; June 6-8; Adjunct Proceedings http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=068;article=010 (accessed 10/25/2014)