|Fulltext||2.22 MB||PDF (requires Acrobat Reader)||Previous | Next|
|Authors:||Nicola Morelli: School of Architecture and Design, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark|
|Publication title:||Beyond the experience. In search of an operative paradigm for the industrialisation of services|
|Conference:||Conference Proceedings ServDes.2009; DeThinking Service; ReThinking Design; Oslo Norway 24-26 November 2009|
|Publication type:||Abstract and Fulltext|
|Abstract:||After many years; in which service design occupied some blurred areas in different disciplines; this activity is now creating its own ground and consolidating both practice and research. The increasing number of conferences and publications on service design; the growing number of cases and the emergence of new education programs are contributing to raise service design to the status of an independent disciplinary area.|
The contributions to the definition of a disciplinary corpus for service design come from two main directions: the first concerns the definition of a methodological framework for service design. This area is developing methodological tools for analysing; designing and representing services. The second area focuses on real cases; developing projects that are advancing the practice of service design and making service design visible to private business and public administrations.
The two areas mentioned above are developed along different disciplinary traditions; the first area refers to studies in management; organisation and engineering (Bitner; Booms; & Tetreault; 1990; G. Hollins; Hollins; Bill; 1993; Ramaswamy; 1996; Zeithaml; Bitner; & Gremler; 2006). This area emphasised technical and organisational aspects in designing a service; looking at a service as a production system. The second area has been inspired by interaction design studies (Pacenti; 1998; Sangiorgi; 2004); however the specific theme of service design has been developed in some schools and teaching programs beyond the traditional domain of Interaction design; focusing on experiential issues related to a wide range of product-service systems. The focus of this area is the service encounter¸ i.e. the physical or virtual space in which the service provider(s) come in contact with the customers.
The parallel and asymmetric development of the two areas led to separate methodological approaches. This paper will illustrate such a development with the aim of emphasising the gap between the two areas and exploring possibilities to develop a broader operative paradigm for the design of services.
|No. of pages:||14|
|Series:||Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings|
|Publisher:||Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet|
|REFERENCE TO THIS PAGE |