|Fulltext||0.22 MB||PDF (requires Acrobat Reader)||Previous | Next|
|Authors:||Alexander Komashie: Systems Engineering Research Group, Brunel University, West London, UK|
|Ali Mousavi: Systems Engineering Research Group, Brunel University, West London, UK|
|Justin Gore: The North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK|
|Publication title:||A Review of Historical Developments of Quality Assessment in Industry and Healthcare|
|Conference:||10th QMOD Conference. Quality Management and Organiqatinal Development. Our Dreams of Excellence; 18-20 June; 2007 in Helsingborg; Sweden|
|Publication type:||Abstract and Fulltext|
|Abstract:||The quality of healthcare has been a major problem in many Countries for many years. Finding a definition; methods of evaluation; monitoring and improvement have been the major problems that researchers and healthcare practitioners have had to investigate over the years (Idvall et al; 1997). |
Donabedian (1966) noted that the quality of healthcare is a “remarkably difficult notion to define.” Based on a definition offered by Lee and Jones (1933); he concludes that the criteria of quality of care are mere value judgements that are applied to aspects of a process called healthcare. Deming (1986) cites and shares W. A. Shewhart’s view that the difficulty in defining quality emanates from the need to translate future requirements of the user into measurable characteristics so that the product or service can be designed and turned out to satisfy the user. Regarding the quality of healthcare; Deming states that a definition is a “perennial problem”. He adds that healthcare quality has been defined in many ways and that each way seems to serve a special type of problem. In spite of this difficulty in defining the concept; there has always been the need to measure and improve quality.
Moreover; it is evident that better quality has been achieved at different levels in different industries or organisations. For example; Young et al (2004); Merry (2004); Laffel et al (1989); and Mohammed (2004) provide evidence that healthcare practitioners can adopt some of the quality improvement techniques in practice in other industrial systems mainly in the manufacturing sector. Currently there are several cases of attempts being made to apply some industrial systems improvement techniques in healthcare (Komashie and Mousavi; 2005; Moore; 2003; Dodds; 2005).
This paper attempts to extract information from a comparative analysis of quality improvement methods in industry and healthcare and to suggest some directions for further study. It is primarily concerned with the general concepts of quality assessment within these industries at various points in time and how these concepts have changed. It must also be noted that there are volumes of publications on quality both in healthcare and industry but this paper is not an exhaustive review of relevant literature. It is however believed that the sources selected for this study are representative of the major trends in quality particularly in the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
|Keywords:||Quality improvement; quality methods; industry; healthcare|
|No. of pages:||9|
|Series:||Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings|
|Publisher:||Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet|
|REFERENCE TO THIS PAGE |