Article | Proceedings of The 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2019, August 12-16, Västerås, Sweden | Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion Modeling of Lignocellulosic Hot Water Extract using ADM1 Linköping University Electronic Press Conference Proceedings
Göm menyn

Title:
Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion Modeling of Lignocellulosic Hot Water Extract using ADM1
Author:
Zahra Nikbakht Kenarsari: Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway Nirmal Ghimire: Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway Rune Bakke: Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway Wenche Hennie Bergland: Department of Process, Energy and Environmental Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp20170125
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2019
Conference:
Proceedings of The 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2019, August 12-16, Västerås, Sweden
Issue:
170
Article no.:
019
Pages:
125-131
No. of pages:
7
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2020-01-24
ISBN:
978-91-7929-897-5
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

Lignocellulosic biomass is abundant and can become a major feed for anaerobic digestion methane production if its natural recalcitrance is overcome by pretreatment. Bio-degradable organic molecules were extracted by hot water (to produce “hydrolysate”) from wood (Norway spruce). A high rate anaerobic sludge bed reactor fed the hydrolysate was modeled by the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No.1 (ADM1). Biodegradability kinetics for the hydrolysate material was obtained from batch tests at thermophilic condition, and the hydrolysis kinetic coefficient of carbohydrate was found. Thus the kinetic coefficient was equal to 0.44 1/d was used to simulate UASB reactor performance at 55°C and comparing results to measured parameters from an experimental reactor at five different organic loading rates. The simulation results correlated well with the experimental results for biogas production rate, biogas composition and chemical oxygen demand. This shows that ADM1 is a powerful tool to predict the behavior of thermophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) of pretreated lignocellulosic feed using standard ADM1 parameters except for hydrolysis kinetics. Hydrolysis was identified as the overall rate limiting step in AD of such feed in UASB.

Keywords: thermophilic anaerobic digestion, OLR, lignocellulosic hydrolysate, hydrolysis kinetic, ADM1

Proceedings of The 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2019, August 12-16, Västerås, Sweden

Author:
Zahra Nikbakht Kenarsari, Nirmal Ghimire, Rune Bakke, Wenche Hennie Bergland
Title:
Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion Modeling of Lignocellulosic Hot Water Extract using ADM1
DOI:
10.3384/ecp20170125
References:

T.E. Amidon and S. Liu. Water-based woody biorefinery. Biotechnology advances, 27:542-550, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.012.

B.E.L Baeta, H. Luna, A.L. Sanson, S.d.Q. Silva, and S.F.D. Aquino. Degradation of a model azo dye in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) operated with powdered activated carbon (PAC). Journal of environmental management, 128:462-470, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.038.

D.J. Batstone, J. Keller, J. Angelidaki, S.V. Kalyuzhnyi, S.G. Pavlostathis, A. Rozzi, W.T.M. Sanders, H. Siegrist, and V.A. Vavilin. The IWA anaerobic digestion model no 1 (ADM1). Water Science and Technology, 45: 65-73, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0292.

D.J. Batstone, J. Keller, J. Angelidaki, S.V. Kalyuzhnyi, S.G. Pavlostathis, A. Rozzi, W.T.M. Sanders, H. Siegrist, and V.A. Vavilin. Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1). IWA Publishing: London, UK. 2002.

W.H. Bergland, C. Dinamarca, M. Toradzadegan, A.S.R. Nordgård, I. Bakke, and R. Bakke. High Rate Manure Supernatant Digestion. Water Research, 76:1–9, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.051.

A. David, T. Govil, A. Tripathi, J. McGeary, K. Farrar, and R. Sani. Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion: Enhanced and Sustainable Methane Production from Co-Digestion of Food and Lignocellulosic Wastes. Energies, 11(8): 2058, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082058.

M.A. Eddy, F.L. Burton, G. Tchobanoglous, and R. Tsuchihashi. Wastewater engineering: treatment and Resource recovery. McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA. 2013.

G. Gebreeyessus and P. Jenicek. Thermophilic versus mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: a comparative review. Bioengineering, 3(2): 15, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering3020015

T. Gehring, M. Lübken, K. Koch, and M. Wichern. ADM1 simulation of the thermophilic mono-fermentation of maize silage–Use of an uncertainty analysis for substrate characterization. In 13th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion: Recovering (bio) Resources for the World, 28, 2013.

M. Kamali, T. Gameiro, M.E.V. Costa, and I. Capela. Anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill wastes–An overview of the developments and improvement opportunities. Chemical Engineering Journal, 298: 162-182, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.119.

P. Kaparaju, M. Serrano, and I. Angelidaki. Effect of reactor configuration on biogas production from wheat straw hydrolysate. Bioresource technology, 100: 6317-6323, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.101.

T. Karuppiah and V.E. Azariah. Biomass Pretreatment for Enhancement of Biogas Production. IntechOpen. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82088.

M. Kim, Y.H. Ahn, and R. Speece. Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. Water research, 36: 4369-4385, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00147-1.

 

A.S.R. Nordgård, W.H. Bergland, O. Vadstein, V. Mironov, R. Bakke, K. Østgaard, and I. Bakke. Anaerobic digestion of pig manure supernatant at high ammonia concentrations characterized by high abundance of Mathanosaeta and non-euryarchaeotal archaea. Scientific Reports, 7(1): 15077, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14527-1. 

R. J. Patinvoh, O.A. Osadolor, K. Chandolias, I.S. Horváth, and M.J. Taherzadeh. Innovative pretreatment strategies for biogas production. Bioresource technology, 224: 13-24, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.083.

M. Taherzadeh and K. Karimi. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. International journal of molecular sciences, 9:1621-1651, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms9091621.

O. Therasme, T.A. Volk, A.M. Cabrera, M.H. Eisenbies, and T.E. Amidon. Hot Water Extraction Improves the Characteristics of Willow and Sugar Maple Biomass with Different Amount of Bark. Frontiers in Energy Research, 6: 93, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00093.

Y. Xia, H.H. Fang and T. Zhang. Recent studies on thermophilic anaerobic bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. RSC Advances, 3(36): 15528-15542, 2013.

K. Østgaard, V. Kowarz, W. Shuai, I.A. Henry, M. Sposob, H.H. Haugen, and R. Bakke. Syringe test screening of microbial gas production activity: Cases denitrification and biogas formation. Journal of Microbiological Methods 132:119–124, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.11.021.

Proceedings of The 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2019, August 12-16, Västerås, Sweden

Author:
Zahra Nikbakht Kenarsari, Nirmal Ghimire, Rune Bakke, Wenche Hennie Bergland
Title:
Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion Modeling of Lignocellulosic Hot Water Extract using ADM1
DOI:
https://doi.org10.3384/ecp20170125
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2019-11-06