Article | Proceedings of The 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2019, August 12-16, Västerås, Sweden | Comparison and analysis of magnetic noise and drive losses using different PWM methods (1165) Linköping University Electronic Press Conference Proceedings
Göm menyn

Title:
Comparison and analysis of magnetic noise and drive losses using different PWM methods (1165)
Author:
Torbjörn Trosten: Bombardier Transportation, Vasteras, Sweden Henrik Mosskull: Bombardier Transportation, Vasteras, Sweden Daniel Jansson: Bombardier Transportation, Vasteras, Sweden Maher Azaza: Mälardalens University, Vasteras, Sweden Erik Dahlquist: Mälardalens University, Vasteras, Sweden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp2017032
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2019
Conference:
Proceedings of The 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2019, August 12-16, Västerås, Sweden
Issue:
170
Article no.:
005
Pages:
32-35
No. of pages:
4
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2020-01-24
ISBN:
978-91-7929-897-5
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

In this paper, several discontinuous pulse width modulation methods (DPWM) are compared with space-vector pulse width modulation (SV-PWM) method. The comparisons are done based on the measurements of motor magnetic noise and total drive losses for inverter switching frequencies from 500Hz to 4000Hz. It is concluded that using SV-PWM it is possible to reach lower magnetic noise on the traction motor without increasing the total losses significantly.

Keywords: DPWM, SVM, magnetic noise, inverter losses, harmonic losses traction, metro

Proceedings of The 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2019, August 12-16, Västerås, Sweden

Author:
Torbjörn Trosten, Henrik Mosskull, Daniel Jansson, Maher Azaza, Erik Dahlquist
Title:
Comparison and analysis of magnetic noise and drive losses using different PWM methods (1165)
DOI:
10.3384/ecp2017032
References:

A. Andersson and T. Thiringer. Experimental determination of inverter losses and sound consequences of using DPWM in an HEV. In 2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Tampa, FI, pages. 1382-1388, 2017.

A.C. Binojkumar, B. Saritha, and G. Narayanan, Experimental comparison of Conventional and Bus-Clamping PWM Methods Based on Electrical and Acoustic Noise Spectra of Induction Motor Drives. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 52(5):4061-4073, Sept.-Oct. 2016.

H. Van Der Broeck, H. Skudelny, and G. Stanke. Analysis and realization of a pulse width modulator based on voltage space vectors. In Conf. Rec. IEEE-IAS Annu. Meeting,  pages 244–251, 1986.

M. Depenbrock. Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with nonsinusoidal phase voltages, In Conf. Rec. IEEE Int. Semiconductor Power Conversion Conf., pages 399–403, 1977.

A. M. Hava, R. J. Kerkman and T. A. Lipo. A high-performance generalized discontinuous PWM algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 34(5):1059-1071, Sept.-Oct. 1998. doi: 10.1109/28.720446

A. Schonung and H. Stemmler. Static frequency changers with subharmonic control in conjunction with reversible variable-speed ac drives. Brown-Boveri Rev., pp. 555-577, 1964.

Proceedings of The 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling SIMS 2019, August 12-16, Västerås, Sweden

Author:
Torbjörn Trosten, Henrik Mosskull, Daniel Jansson, Maher Azaza, Erik Dahlquist
Title:
Comparison and analysis of magnetic noise and drive losses using different PWM methods (1165)
DOI:
https://doi.org10.3384/ecp2017032
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2019-11-06