Article | Proceedings of SIGRAD 2017, August 17-18, 2017 Norrköping, Sweden | Treating Presence as a Noun — Insights Obtained from Comparing a VE and a 360° Video
Göm menyn

Title:
Treating Presence as a Noun — Insights Obtained from Comparing a VE and a 360° Video
Author:
Martina Tarnawski: Södertörn University, Sweden
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2017
Conference:
Proceedings of SIGRAD 2017, August 17-18, 2017 Norrköping, Sweden
Issue:
143
Article no.:
002
Pages:
9-16
No. of pages:
8
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2017-11-27
ISBN:
978-91-7685-384-9
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

With 360° videos becoming more commercially available, more research is needed in order to evaluate how they are perceived by users. In this study we compare a low-budget computer-generated virtual environment to a low-budget 360° video viewed in VR mode. The Igroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ), discomfort-scores and semi-structured interviews were used to investigate differences and similarities between the two environments. The most fruitful results were obtained from the interviews. The interviews highlight problematic aspects with presence, such as the difficulty of separating reality, real and realistic, which lead to a reconsideration of treating presence as a concept. The conclusions are that VR research should benefit from treating presence as a noun, the feeling of “being there” instead of a unitary concept. We also argue that presence should not by default be considered a goal of a VR experience or VR research.

Keywords: Virtual Reality, Virtual Environment, Presence

Proceedings of SIGRAD 2017, August 17-18, 2017 Norrköping, Sweden

Author:
Martina Tarnawski
Title:
Treating Presence as a Noun — Insights Obtained from Comparing a VE and a 360° Video
References:

[AJGMRG11] Alsina-Jurnet I., Gutiérrez-Maldonado J., Rangel-Gómez M.: The role of presence in the level of anxiety experienced in clinical virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1 (2011), 504–512. 1


[BBA_04] Baños R. M., Botella C., Alcañiz M., Liaño V., Guerrero B., Rey B.: Immersion and emotion: Their impact on the sense of presence. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7, 6 (2004), 734–741. 1


[BC06] Braun V., Clarke V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. 3


[CSSS06] Coelho C. M., Santos J. A., Silvério J., Silva C. F.: Virtual reality and acrophobia: One-year follow-up and case study. CyberPsychology & Behavior 9, 3 (2006), 336–341. 2


[DRC11] Dalvandi A., Riecke B. E., Calvert T.: Panoramic video techniques for improving presence in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 17th Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments & Third Joint Virtual Reality (2011), pp. 103–110. 1, 2, 3, 6


[FAM_00] Freeman J., Avons S. E., Meddis R., Pearson D. E., IJsselsteijn W.: Using behavioral realism to estimate presence: A study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 2 (2000), 149–164. 1, 2, 5


[GT07] Gregg L., Tarrier N.: Virtual reality in mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 42, 5 (2007), 343–354. 1


[IFR00] IJsselsteijn W. A., Freeman J., Ridder H. D.: Presence: Concept, determinants and measurement. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V (2000), vol. 3959 of Proceedings of SPIE Conference. 1, 2, 6


[Igr16] igroup presence questionnaire (IPQ), 2016. 3, 5 [Ins03] Insko B.: Measuring presence: Subjective, behavioral and physiological methods. In Being There: Concepts, effects and measurements of presence in synthetic environments, Riva G., Davide F., IJsselsteijn W. A., (Eds.). IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2003, ch. 7, pp. 109–119. 2


[JP10] Juan M. C., Pérez D.: Using augmented and virtual reality for the development of acrophobic scenarios. Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety. Computers & Graphics 34, 6 (2010), 756–766. 2, 3


[KDSCH12] Kwanguk K., Daeyoung R., Sun K. I., Chan-Hyung K.: Provoked arrangement symptoms in obsessive–compulsive disorder using a virtual environment: A preliminary report. Computers in Biology and Medicine 42, 4 (2012), 422–427. 2


[LD97] Lombard M., Ditton T.: At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, 2 (1997). 1, 6


[LDAR_02] Lin J. J. W., Duh H. B. L., Abi-Rached H., Parker D. E., Furness III T. A.: Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2002 (2002), pp. 164–171. 2, 3


[MAT00] Murray C. D., Arnold P., Thornton B.: Presence accompanying induced hearing loss: Implications for immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 2 (2000), 137–148. 2, 5


[MFGR12] Marini D., Folgieri R., Gadia D., Rizzi A.: Virtual reality as a communication process. Virtual Reality 16, 3 (2012), 233–241. 4


[PSR13] Pillai J. S., Schmidt C., Richir S.: Achieving presence through evoked reality. Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2013), 86. 5


[RC13] Ramalho J., Chambel T.: Immersive 360_ mobile video with an emotional perspective. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international workshop on immersive media experiences (2013), pp. 35–40. 1, 3, 7


[SAvdM_05] Schuemie M. J., Abel B., van der Mast C. A. P. G., Krijn M., Emmelkamp P. M. G.: The effect of locomotion technique on presence, fear and usability in a virtual environment. In Euromedia (Toulouse, Apr. 2005), pp. 129–135. 6


[SFR01] Schubert T., Friedmann F., Regenbrecht H.: The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10, 3 (2001), 266–281. 2


[Sla99] Slater M.: Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8, 5 (1999), 560–565. 5


[SU94] Slater M., Usoh M.: Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2, 3 (1994), 221–233. 6


[SUS94] Slater M., Usoh M., Steed A.: Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 3, 2 (1994), 130–144. 3


[SUS95] Slater M., Usoh M., Steed A.: Taking steps: The influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2, 3 (1995), 201–219. 1


[TMTC03] Turner P., McGregor I., Turner S., Carroll F.: Evaluating soundscapes as a means of creating a sense of place. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Auditory Display (2003). 1, 2, 3


[WBBL_15] Wrzesien M., Botella C., Bretón-López J., del Río González E., Burkhardt J.-M., Alcañiz M., Pérez-Ara M. A.: Treating small animal phobias using a projective-augmented reality system: A single-case study. Computers in Human Behavior 49 (2015), 343–353. 2


[WHB_07] Wirth W., Hartmann T., Böcking S., Vorderer P., Klimmt C., Schramm H., Saari T., Laarni J., Ravaja N., Gouveia F. R., Biocca F., Sacau A., Jäncke L., Baumgartner T., Jäncke P.: A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology 9, 3 (2007), 93–525. 1, 2


[WS98] Witmer B. G., Singer M. J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 3 (1998), 225–240. 2, 5


[WSPW15] Weibel D., Schmutz J., Pahud O., Wissmath B.: Measuring spatial presence: Introducing and validating the pictorial presence SAM. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 24, 1 (2015), 44–61. 2, 6

Proceedings of SIGRAD 2017, August 17-18, 2017 Norrköping, Sweden

Author:
Martina Tarnawski
Title:
Treating Presence as a Noun — Insights Obtained from Comparing a VE and a 360° Video
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21