Article | Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference | Understanding the Influence of the Co-Design Process on Well-Being
Göm menyn

Title:
Understanding the Influence of the Co-Design Process on Well-Being
Author:
Josina Vink: CTF - Service Research Center, Karlstad University & Experio Lab, County Council of Värmland, Sweden Katarina Wetter-Edman: CTF - Service Research Center, Karlstad University & Experio Lab, County Council of Värmland, Sweden Bo Edvardsson: CTF - Service Research Center, Karlstad University & Experio Lab, County Council of Värmland, Sweden Bård Tronvoll: CTF - Service Research Center, Karlstad University & Experio Lab, County Council of Värmland, Sweden
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2016
Conference:
Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference
Issue:
125
Article no.:
032
Pages:
390-402
No. of pages:
13
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2016-05-17
ISBN:
978-91-7685-738-0
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

The aim of this paper is to explicitly link co-design to well-being and expand the conversation about the influence of the co-design process on well-being. This paper highlights considerations for co-design researchers and practitioners interested in enhancing the value created through co-design. The authors draw from discussions in transformative service research (TSR) to better understand how co-design influences well-being. Co-design is defined as a process of joint inquiry and imagination where diverse actors share and combine their knowledge. Based on the broad definition of service set out in service- dominant logic (SDL), the authors take the position that co-design is a form of service and therefore stress the relevance of TSR to co-design. The paper identifies six dimensions of well-being discussed in TSR that extend and highlight gaps in co-design literature related to the influence of the co-design process on well-being. The authors suggest that these dimensions become a component of future evaluations of the co-design process and point to opportunities for further research related to how co-design influences well-being and supports transformation.

Keywords: co-design, well-being, transformation, transformative service research, service design, service-dominant logic

Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference

Author:
Josina Vink, Katarina Wetter-Edman, Bo Edvardsson, Bård Tronvoll
Title:
Understanding the Influence of the Co-Design Process on Well-Being
References:

Anderson, L., & Ostrom, A.L. (2015). Transformative service research: Advancing our knowledge about service and well-being. Journal of Service Research. 18(3). 243-249.


Anderson, L., Ostrom, A. L., Corus, C., Fisk, R. P., Gallan, A. S., Giraldo, M., Mende, M., Mulder, M., Rayburn, S. W., Rosenbaum, M. S., Shirahada, K., & Williams, J. D. (2013). Transformative service research: An agenda for the future. Journal of Business Research. 66. 1203-1210.


Blocker, C.P., & Barrios, A. (2015). The transformative value of service experience. Journal of Service Research. 18(3). 265-283.


Brandt, E. (2006). Designing exploratory design games. In Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design. 57-66.


Cautela, C., Rizzo, F., & Zurlo, F. (2009). Service design logic: An approach based on the different service categories. Politecnico di Milano. Proceedings of International Association of Societies of Design Research. Retrieved 09 11, 2015, from: http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/viewFile/890/339


Carr, V., Sangiorgi, D., B√ľscher, M., Cooper, R., & Junginger, S. (2009). Clinicians as service designers? reflections on current transformation in the UK health services. Imagination Lancaster. First Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation. Retrieved 08 24, 2015, from: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/059/004/ecp09059004.pdf


Clatworthy, S., Oorschot, R., & Lindquister, B. (2014). How to Get a Leader to Talk: Tangible Objects for Strategic Conversations in Service Design. Proceedings of ServDes 2014. 09.04.2014‚Äď11.04.2014. 270‚Äď280. Retrieved 10 01, 2015, from: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=099;article=026


Donetto, S., Pierri, P., Tsianakas, V., & Robert, G. (2014). Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: realising participatory design in the public sector. Fourth Service Design and Innovation conference. Lancaster, United Kingdom. Retrieved 08 18, 2015, from: http://www.servdes.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Donetto-S-Pierri-P-Tsianakas-V-Robert-G.pdf


Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., & Roos, I. (2005) Service portraits in service research: A critical review. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 6(1). 107‚Äď121.


Edvardsson, B., Sk√•len, P., & Tronvoll, B., (2012). Service systems a foundation for resource integration and value co-creation. Stephen L. Vargo, Robert F. Lusch (ed.). Special Issue ‚Äď Toward a Better Understanding of the Role of Value in Markets and Marketing. Review of Marketing Research. 9(2). 79-126.


Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 39(2). 327-339.


Eneberg, M. (2011). The enabling service of the industrial design consultancy: A change of focus from goods- to service dominant logic. Licentiate Thesis. Lund University. Retrieved 09 17, 2015, from: http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3460254


Freire, K., & Sangiorgi, D. (2010). Service design and healthcare innovation: from consumption to coproduction and co-creation. Second Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation. Linköping, Sweden. Retrieved 08 15, 2015, from: http://www.servdes.org/pdf/2010/freire-sangiorgi.pdf


Hussain, S., Sanders, E., and Steinert, M. (2012). Participatory design with marginalized people in developing countries: challenges and opportunities experienced in a field study in Cambodia. International Journal of Design. 6(2). 91-109.


Kuppelwieser, V.G., & Finsterwalder, J. (2016). Transformative service research and service dominant logic: Quo Vaditis? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 28 (2016). 91-98.


Lusch, R., Vargo, S. & Wessels, G. (2008). Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM Systems Journal. 47(1).


Mattelmäki, T. & Visser, F.S. (2011). Lost in co-x: Interpretations of co-design and co-creation. 4th World Conference on Design Research. Delft, the Netherlands. Roozenburg, M.F.M., Chen, L.L, & Stappers, P.J. (Ed.).


Norman, D.A., & Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and radical innovation: design research vs. technology and meaning change. DesignIssues. 30(1). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


Ostrom, A.L., Bitner, M.J., Brown, S.W. Burkhard, K.A., Goul M., Smith-Daniels, V., & Rabinovich, E. (2010). Moving forward and making a difference: Research priorities for the science of service. Journal of Service Research. 13(1). 4-36.


Patricio, L., Fisk, R., Falc√£o e Cunha, J., & Constantine, L. (2011). Multilevel service design: From customer value creation to consumer service experience blueprinting. Journal of Service Research. 14(2). 180-200.


Rosenbaum, M.S., Corus, C., Ostrom, A.L., Anderson, L., Fisk, R.P., Gallan, A.S., Giraldo, M., Mende, M., Mulder, M., Rayburn, S.W., Shirahada, K., & Williams, J.D. (2011). Conceptualization and aspirations of transformative service research. Journal of Research for Consumers. (19).


Sanders, L. (2008). An evolving map of design practice and design research. ACM ‚ÄĒ Interactions. 15(6).


Sanders, E. & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved 07 20, 2015, from: http://www.maketools.com/articles-papers/CoCreation_Sanders_Stappers_08_preprint.pdf


Sangiorgi, D. (2010). Transformative services and transformation design. International Journal of Design. Vol.5 No.1 2010. Retrieved 08 20, 2015, from: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/060/006/ecp10060006.pdf


Sangiorgi, D., & Prendiville, A. (2014). A theoretical framework for studying service design practices: First steps to a mature field. 19th DMI: Academic Design Management Conference. Retreived 09 21, 2015, from: http://imagination.lancs.ac.uk/outcomes/Theoretical_Framework_Studying_Service_Design_Practices_First_steps_mature_field


Sangiorgi, D., Prendiville, A., & Ricketts, A. (2014). Mapping and developing service design research in the UK. Service Design Research UK Network. Retrieved 09 06, 2015, from: http://www.servicedesignresearch.com/uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Mapping-and-Devloping-SDR-in-the-UK.pdf


Skålen, P., Aal, K., & Edvardsson, B., (2015). Cocreating the Arab Spring: Understanding transformation of service systems in contention. Journal of Service Research. 18 (3). 250-264.


Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. DesignIssues. 29(2). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 08 13, 2015, from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/249335514_Co-Design_as_a_Process_of_Joint_Inquiry_and_Imagination


Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, K. (2011). Benefits of Co-design in Service Design Projects. International Journal of Design. Vol.5 No.2 2011. Retreived 08 13, 2015, from http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/viewFile/890/339


Taffe, S. (2015). The hybrid designer/end-user: Revealing paradoxes in co-design. Design Studies. 40. 39-59.


Trischler, J. & Sinnewe, E. (2012). The concept of on-going interactions in co-design: Insights from three different disciplines. Third Nordic Conference on Service Design and ServiceInnovation. Retrieved 09 21 2015, from: http://servdes.org/pdf/2012/trischler-sinnewe.pdf


Vargo, S. & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing. 68. 1‚Äď17.


Vargo, S. & Lusch, R. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 36. 1‚Äď10.


Vargo, S. & Lusch, R. (2010). It’s all B2B‚Ķand beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial marketing management. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.026


Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2015). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Research. Springer.


Visser, F. S., Stappers, P. J., Van der Lugt, R. (2005). Contextmapping: Experiences from practice. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts. Vol. 1 No. 2. Taylor and Francis. Retrieved 09 06, 2015, from: http://studiolab.io.tudelft.nl/manila/gems/sleeswijkvisser/Codesign2005sleeswijk.pdf


Wetter-Edman, K. (2009). Exploring overlaps and differences in service dominant logic and design thinking. First Nortic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation. Oslo, Norway. Retrieved 09 06, 2015, from: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/059/016/ecp09059016.pdf


Wetter-Edman, K. (2012). Relations and rationales of user’s involvement in service design and service management. In S. Miettinen & A. Valtonen (Eds.), Service Design with Theory. Discussions on Change, Value and Methods: Satu Miettinen. 107-116. Rovaniemi 978-952-484-551-9978-952-484-551-9. Lapland University Press.


Wetter-Edman, K., Sangiorgi, D., Edvardsson, B., Holmlid, S., Grönroos, C., & Mattelmäki, T. (2014). Design for value co-creation: Exploring synergies between design for service and service logic. Service Science. 6(2), 106-121.

Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference

Author:
Josina Vink, Katarina Wetter-Edman, Bo Edvardsson, Bård Tronvoll
Title:
Understanding the Influence of the Co-Design Process on Well-Being
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21