Article | Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference | The Role of Design As a Critical Friend to the Voluntary Community Sector
Göm menyn

The Role of Design As a Critical Friend to the Voluntary Community Sector
Laura Warwick: School of Design, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK Robert Young: School of Design, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
Full text (pdf)
Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference
Article no.:
No. of pages:
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
ISSN (online):
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet

Export in BibTex, RIS or text

This paper presents one of the key findings from a recent Doctoral inquiry into the relevance and applicability of adopting a Design for Service (DfS) approach to effect transformation in Voluntary Community Sector (VCS) contexts. The research used case study method, reflective practice and content analysis to establish that the use of design at a systemic level of a VCS organisation could incite transformational change. The paper reveals that the stakeholders’ initial trust in the designer is more important than their trust in the DfS approach (methods and processes), which becomes crucial to increasing the influence of design in the organisation. Once the designer becomes a ‘friend’ to the organisation, they can operate at an embedded level as a ‘critical friend’, which allows them to challenge the status quo and create new organisational perspectives. The paper finally presents a ‘critical friend’ model depicting how design can be used to effect transformation in such settings.

Keywords: design for service, transformation, critical friend, charity, public services

Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference

Laura Warwick, Robert Young
The Role of Design As a Critical Friend to the Voluntary Community Sector

Acklin, C. (2013). Design management absorption in SMEs with little or no prior design experience. Imagination Lancaster.

Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2007). Bringing User Experience to Healthcare Improvement: The Concepts, Methods and Practices of Experience-based Design. Oxford, England: Radcliffe Publishing.

Blyth, S., & Kimbell, L. (2011). Design Thinking and the Big Society : From solving personal troubles to designing social problems. London: Acant and Taylor Haig. Retrieved from

Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Director 00123242 (Vol. 31). New York City, USA: Harper Business.

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.

Burns, C., Cottam, H., Vanstone, C., & Winhall, J. (2006). RED paper 02: Transformation Design. Design (Vol. 44). London: Design Council.

Clarke, J., Kane, D., Wilding, K., & Bass, P. (2012). UK Civil Society Almanac 2012. Retrieved from

Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the Lens of Critical Friends. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51.

Denzin, N. (1988). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.

Design Commission. (2013). Restarting Britain 2: Design and public services. London. Retrieved from

Design Council. (2010). Public Services by Design. London: Design Council.

Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2007). Critical Design FAQ. Retrieved October 30, 2014, from

English, S. (2006). Design thinking - Value Innovation - Deductive reason and the designers choice. In K. Friedman, T. Love, E. Corte-Real, & C. Rust (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Design Research Society Conference (pp. 1–10). Lisbon: IADE.

Freire, K., & Sangiorgi, D. (2009). Service Design & Healthcare Innovation: from consumption to co-production and co-creation. In Proceedings of ServDes. 2009. Second Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation. (pp. 39–49).

Gloppen, J. (2011). The Strategic Use of Service Design for Leaders in Service Organizations. FORMakademisk, 4(2), 3–25.

Han, Q. (2010). Practices and Principles in Service Design: Stakeholder, Knowledge and Community of Service - A Summary. Dundee, Scotland: University of Dundee.

HM Government. (2010). The Coalition: our programme for government. London. Retrieved from

Hollins, W. (1993). Design in the service sector. Managing Service Quality, 3(3), 33–37.

Junginger, S. (2006). Change in the making: Organizational change through human-centered product development. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Carnegie Mellon.

Junginger, S., & Sangiorgi, D. (2009). Service Design and Organizational Change : Bridging the Gap Between Rigour and Relevance. In Proceedings of the 3rd IASDR Conference on Design Research (pp. 4339–4348). Seoul, South Korea: Korean Society of Design Science.

Kellock Hay, G., Beattie, R. S., Livingstone, R., & Munro, P. (2001). Change, HRM and the voluntary sector. Employee Relations, 23(3), 240–256.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. In K. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving Social Conflict. London: Harper & Row.

MacBeath, J., Schratz, M., Meuret, D., & Jakobsen, L. (2000). Self-evaluation in European Schools. London: Routledge.

Malmberg, L., & Holmlid, S. (2013). Embedding design capacity in research driven innovation teams. In Proceedings from Tsinghua international design management symposium, Shenzhen.

Manzini, E. (2009). New Design Knowledge. Design Studies, 30, 4–12.

Manzini, E. (2010). Design for Social Innovation: Creative Communities and Design-Oriented Networks. SEE Bulletin, (3), 3–5.

Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2011). All You Need to Know About Action Research (2nd Edn.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Meroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. (2011). Design for Services. Adelshot: Gower Publishing.

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Retrieved from

Needham, C., & Carr, S. (2009). Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Retrieved from

Nimkulrat, N. (2007). The Role of Documentation in Practice-Led Research. Journal of Research Practice, 3(1), 1–8.

Oakley Smith, I., Bradshaw, C., & Lewis, P. (2012). Managing charities in the new normal – A perfect storm? Retrieved from

Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

Robson, C. (2011). Real World Research (3rd Edn.). Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18.

Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professional think in action. Design. New York: Basic Books.

Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of Co-design in Service Design Projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 53–61. Retrieved from

Swaffield, S. (2004). Critical friends: supporting leadership, improving learning. Improving Schools, 7(3), 267–278.

Tan, L. (2012). Understanding the Different Roles of the Designer in Design for Social Good. Design Methodology in the DoTT 07 (Designs of the Times 2007) Projects. Northumbria University.

Thomas, D. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

Thorpe, A. (2008). Design as Activism: A Conceptual Tool. In C. Cipolla & P. Peruccio (Eds.), Changing the Change: Design, Visions, Propsals and Tools Proceedings. Italy: Allemandi Conference Press.

Voluntary Organisations’ Network North East. (2011). Surviving or Thriving: Tracking the impact of spending cuts on the North East’s third sector. Retrieved from

Warwick, L. (2015). Can Design Effect Transformational Change in the Voluntary Community Sector? Northumbria University.

Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd Edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An Analysis and Critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 310–319). New York: ACM Press.

Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference

Laura Warwick, Robert Young
The Role of Design As a Critical Friend to the Voluntary Community Sector
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
No citations available at the moment

Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21