Article | Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference | Low Threshold Service Design: Desktop Walkthrough
Göm menyn

Title:
Low Threshold Service Design: Desktop Walkthrough
Author:
Johan Blomkvist: Linköping University, Sweden Annita Fjuk: Linköping University, Sweden Vasilisa Sayapina: Linköping University, Sweden
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2016
Conference:
Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference
Issue:
125
Article no.:
013
Pages:
154-166
No. of pages:
13
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2016-05-17
ISBN:
978-91-7685-738-0
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

This paper introduces the first academic characterisation of the desktop walkthrough technique. Desktop walkthrough is considered here as a service design technique using a collaboratively built miniature environment to construct knowledge about a specific service. It is further examined as a technique for rapidly exploring and designing a service concept. The analytical lens of the paper is outlined from socio-cultural theories on human development where any human action is developed from, and emulated by, social interactions and the intellectual and physical artefacts herein. The analysis shows that desktop walkthrough enabled teams to design a holistic service journey with low threshold usage, and provided a means for exploring and designing the complexity of customer journeys and the backstage organizational processes.

Keywords: desktop walkthrough, design games, case study, activity theory

Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference

Author:
Johan Blomkvist, Annita Fjuk, Vasilisa Sayapina
Title:
Low Threshold Service Design: Desktop Walkthrough
References:

Berge, O., & Fjuk, A. (2005). Att förstå lärgemenskapers komplexa organisationsfromer [Swedish]. In O. Jobring, & U. Carlén (Eds.), Att Förstå lärgemenskaper och mötesplatser på nätet (pp. 55-79). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.


Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 56-71.


Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Morgan, F. N. (2008). Service Blueprinting: A practical Technique for Service Innovation. California Management Review, 50(3), 66-94.


Blomkvist, J. (2014). Representing Future Situations of Service: Prototyping in Service Design. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press.


Blomkvist, J., & Segelström, F. (2014). Benefits of External Representations in Service Design: A Distributed Cognition Perspective. The Design Journal, 17(3), 331-346.


Brandt, E. (2006). Designing Exploratory Design Games: A Framework for Participation in Participatory Design? Proceedings of the ninth Participatory Design Conference 2006 (pp. 57-66). Trento, Italy: ACM.


Buur, J., & Matthews, B. (2008). Participatory Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 255‚Äď273.


Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1992). Cardboard computers: mocking-it-up or hands-on the future. In J. Greenbaum, & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 169-196). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.


Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.


Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.


Engine. (n.d.). Desktop walkthroughs. Retrieved 08 31, 2010, from Engine Service Design: http://www.enginegroup.co.uk/service_design/m_page/desktop_walkthroughs


Eriksen, M. A. (2014). What triggers Us?! A Close Look at Socio-Material Situations of Co-designing Services. Proceedings of the fourth Service Design and Service Innovation Conference, ServDes (pp. 259-269). Lancaster, UK: LiU Elektronic Press.


Eriksen, M. A., Brandt, E., Mattelmäki, T., & Vaajakallio, K. (2014). Taking Design Games Seriously: Re-connecting Situated Power Relations of People and Materials. Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference (pp. 101-110). Windhoek, Namibia: ACM.


Fjuk, A., Nurminen, M. I., & Sm√łrdal, O. (1997). Taking articulation work seriously ‚Äď an Activity Theoretical Approach. Turku, Finland: Turku Center for Cunputer Science.


Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. CHI’2003 (pp. 233‚Äď240). NY, USA: ACM Press.


Gudiksen, S. (2015). Business Model Design Games: Rules and Procedures to Challenge Assumptions and Elicit Surprises. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 307-322.


Harvard Business Review. (2015). The Evolution of Design Thinking. Harvard Business Reivew, 2015(September).


Kaptelinin, V., & Uden, L. (2012). Understanding delegated actions: Toward an activity-theoretical perspective on customer-centred service design. Proceedings of the Service Design and Innovation Conference, ServDes (pp. 101-109). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press.


Klabbers, J. H. (2003). The gaming landscape: A taxonomy for classifying games and simulations. The first DiGRA conference (pp. 54-68). Utrecht, The Netherlands: KMPC.


Leontiev, A. N. (1983). Virksomhed, Bevidsthed, Personlighed. [Danish]. K√łbenhavn, Denmark: Forlaget Progress.


Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying Context: A Comparison of Actibity Theory, Situated Action Models, and Distributed Cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and Conscioussness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 69-102). USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


Polaine, A., L√łvlie, L., & Reason, B. (2013). Service Design: From Insights to Implementation. Brooklyn, New York, USA: Rosenfeld Media, LLC.


Rawson, A., Duncan, E., & Jones, C. (2013). The truth about customer experience. Harvard Business Review(September 2013), 90-98.


Sanders, E. B.-N. (2000). Generative Tools for Co-designing. In S. A. Scrivener, L. J. Ball, & A. Woodcock (Ed.), Proceedings of CoDesigning 2000 (pp. 3-12). Coventry, UK: Springer.


Sangiorgi, D. (2009). Building Up a Framework for Service Design Research. 8th European Academy Of Design Conference, (pp. 415-420). Aberdeen, Scotland.


Segelström, F. (2013). Stakeholder Engagement for Service Design: How Service Designers Identify and Communicate Insights. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping Electronic Press.


Shostack, L. (1982). How to Design a Service. European Journal of Marketing(161), 49-63.


Star, S., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ’Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.


Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande & kulturelle redskap. Om läreprocesser och det kollektiva [Swedish]. Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.


Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voice of Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Wright, M. (2012, January). Customer Journey: Driving income and growth in tough markets. Retrieved from Martin Writght Associates: www.martinwrightassociates.co.uk


Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher social processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference

Author:
Johan Blomkvist, Annita Fjuk, Vasilisa Sayapina
Title:
Low Threshold Service Design: Desktop Walkthrough
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21