Article | Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference | Ways of Seeing the Design Material of Service
Göm menyn

Ways of Seeing the Design Material of Service
Johan Blomkvist: Linköping University, Sweden Simon Clatworthy: Linköping University, Sweden Stefan Holmlid: Linköping University, Sweden
Full text (pdf)
Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference
Article no.:
No. of pages:
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
ISSN (online):
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet

Export in BibTex, RIS or text

This paper makes a contribution to the current conceptualisation of service as a design material from three different perspectives. We use definitions of the term material, the connection with service logic and the techniques that service designers use to discuss ways to understand service from a design perspective. Service designers have tools for working with components, things, locations, actions, procedures, interactions and experiences at their disposal. Service designers work with a meta-material for the most part, which is a material representation of the services they are (re-)designing. Unlike fields where the material is worked into a finished form, the material of service design traverses between the concrete and the abstract throughout the design process.

Keywords: design material, perspectives

Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference

Johan Blomkvist, Simon Clatworthy, Stefan Holmlid
Ways of Seeing the Design Material of Service

Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Morgan, F. N. (2008). Service Blueprinting: A practical Technique for Service Innovation. California Management Review, 50(3), 66-94.

Blevis, E., Lim, Y., & Stolterman, E. (2006). Regarding software as a material of design. Proceedings of Design Research Society Conference. Lisbon, Portugal.

Blomkvist, J. (2015). Ways of Seeing Service: Surrogates for a Design Material. Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference (pp. 1-4). Stockholm, Sweden: Nordes.

Blomkvist, J. (2014). Representing Future Situations of Service: Prototyping in Service Design. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press.

Blomkvist, J., & Segelström, F. (2014). Benefits of External Representations in Service Design: A Distributed Cognition Perspective. The Design Journal, 17(3), 331-346.

Buchanan, R. (2001). Designing research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23.

Capjon, J. (2005). Engaged Collaborative Ideation supported through Material Catalysation. Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference (pp. 1-6). Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordes.

Clatworthy, S. (2011). Service Innovation Through Touch-points: Development of an Innovation Toolkit for the First Stages of New Service Development. Interantional Journal of Design, 5(2), 15-28.

Clatworthy, S. (2013). Design support at the front end of the New Service Development (NSD) process: The role of touch-points and service personality in supporting team work and innovation processes. [PhD Thesis] Oslo, Norway: Arkitekth√łgskolen i Oslo.

Cross, N. (2007). From a Design Science to a Design Discipline: Understanding Designerly Ways of Knowing and Thinking. In R. Michel (Ed.), Design Research Now: Essays and Selected Projects (pp. 41-54). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.

Gaver, W. (1996). Affordances for interaction: The social is material. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111-129.

Hallnäs, L., & Redström, J. (2006). Interaction design : foundations, experiments. Borås, Sweden: University College of Borås.

Holmlid, S. (2007). Interaction design and service design: Expanding a comparison of design disciplines. Nordes. Stockholm.

Holmlid, S. (2008). Towards an understanding of the challenges for design management and service design. International DMI Education Conference.

esign Thinking: New Challenges for Designers, Managers and Organizations. Cergy-Pointose, France: Design Management Institute.

Holmlid, S. (2012). Designing for Resourcefulness in Service: some Assumptions and Consequences. In S. Miettinen, & A. Valtonen (Eds.), Service Design with Theory: Discussions on Change, Value, and Methods (pp. 149-158). Vantaa, Finland: Lapland University Press.

Karana, E., Hekkert, P., & Kandachar, P. (2008). Material considerations in product design: A survey on crucial material aspects used by product designers. Materials & Design, 29(6), 1081-1089.

Kimbell, L. (2009). Insights from Service Design Practice. 8th European Academy of Design Conference, (pp. 249-253). Aberdeen.

Kimbell, L. (2011). Designing for Service as One Way of Designing Services. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 41-52.

Koivisto, M. (2009). Frameworks for structuring services and customer experiences. In S. Miettinen, & M. Koivisto, Designing Services with Innovative Methods (pp. 136-149). Keuruu, Finland: Kuopio Academy of Design.

Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Design av informationsteknik: materialet utan egenskaper (2:a upplagan ed.). Lund, Sverige: Studentlitteratur.

Meroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. (2011). Design for Services. Farnham, England: Gower Publishing.

Merriam-Webster. (2012, 06 06). Dictionary. Retrieved from Merriam Webster:

Meyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding customer experience. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 117-126.

Molin-Juustila, T. (2006). Market Centered Model of the Early Phases of SW Product Development. Oulu, Finland: Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Oulu.

Nordby, K. (2010). Conceptual designing and technology: Short-range RFID as design material. International Journal of Design, 4(1), 29-44.

Parker, S., & Heapy, J. (2006). The Journey to the Interface. London: Demos.

Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2004). The role of multichannel integration in customer relationship management. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 527-538.

Pei, E. (2009). Building a common language of design representations for Industrial Designers & Engineering Designers. Loughborough University, Loughborough: Unpublished PhD Thesis.

Persson, S. (2005). Toward Enhanced Interaction Between Engineering Design and Industrial Design. Gothemburg, Sweden: Unpublished, Gothenburg University.

Sangiorgi, D. (2009). Building Up a Framework for Service Design Research. 8th European Academy Of Design Conference, (pp. 415-420). Aberdeen, Scotland.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How prefessionals think in action. USA: Basic Books.

Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation. Research in Engineering Design, 1992(3), 131-147.

Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of Seeing and their Functions in Designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135-156.

Secomandi, F., & Snelders, D. (2011). The Object of Service Design. Design Issues, 27(3), 20-34.

Shostack, L. (1984). Designing Services that Deliver. Harvard Business Review, 62(1), 133-139.

Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (Eds.). (2010). This is Service Design Thinking: Basics - Tools - Cases. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: BIS Publishers.

Wetter-Edman, K. (2014). Design for Service ‚Äď A framework for articulating designers‚Äô contribution as interpreter of users‚Äô experience. PhD Thesis. Gothenburg, Sweden: Litorapid Media AB.

Zomerdijk, L. G., & Voss, C. A. (2010). Service Design for Experience-Centric Services. Journal of Service Research, 13(1), 67-82.

Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the ServDes.2016 Conference

Johan Blomkvist, Simon Clatworthy, Stefan Holmlid
Ways of Seeing the Design Material of Service
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
No citations available at the moment

Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21