Article | Independent in the heard: Inclusion and exclusion as social processes. Proceedings from the 9th GRASP conference, Linköping University, May 2014 | Conversational Arguments in Small Group Decision Making: Reasoning Activity and Perceived Influence Over the Decision are Keys for Success
Göm menyn

Title:
Conversational Arguments in Small Group Decision Making: Reasoning Activity and Perceived Influence Over the Decision are Keys for Success
Author:
Pär Löfstrand: Department of Psychology, Mid Sweden University, Sweden
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2014
Conference:
Independent in the heard: Inclusion and exclusion as social processes. Proceedings from the 9th GRASP conference, Linköping University, May 2014
Issue:
121
Article no.:
004
Pages:
64-81
No. of pages:
18
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2015-01-21
ISBN:
978-91-7519-217-8
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

This study explored decision making in small groups. There were 81 participants forming 21 ad-hoc groups of about four members each with the aim of reaching a joint decision. Correlations between participants’ evaluations of satisfaction and group efficiency on the one hand, and perceived equality in the influence over the discussion and the decision on the other hand, revealed associations especially with regard to influence over the decision. Those perceiving equal influence over the decision experienced more satisfaction and efficiency. Conversational patterns in three successful versus three unsuccessful groups (based on the group mean level of evaluated satisfaction and group efficiency) were analyzed by use of Conversational Argument Coding Scheme. Successful groups had more reasoning activities, especially responses and justifications, than did unsuccessful groups.

Keywords: Conversational Arguments; Decision-making; Equality, Influence; Satisfaction; Small Groups

Independent in the heard: Inclusion and exclusion as social processes. Proceedings from the 9th GRASP conference, Linköping University, May 2014

Author:
Pär Löfstrand
Title:
Conversational Arguments in Small Group Decision Making: Reasoning Activity and Perceived Influence Over the Decision are Keys for Success
References:

Baird, K., & Wang, H. (2010). Employee empowerment: Extent of adoption and influential factors. Personnel Review, 39(5), 574-599.


Barr, S., & Gold, J. M. (2014). Redundant visual information enhances group decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(6), 2124-2130.


Beck, S. J., Gronewold, K. L., & Western, K. J. (2012). Intergroup argumentation in city government decision-making: The wal-mart dilemma. Small Group Research, 43(5), 587-612.


Behfar, K.J., Mannix, E.A., Peterson, R.S., & Trochim, W.M. (2011). Conflict in small groups: The meaning and consequences of process conflict. Small Group Research, 42, 127-176.


Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 543-549.


Canary, D.J., & Seibold, D.R (2010). Origins and development of the Conversational Argument Coding scheme Communications Methods and Measures, 4:1-2, 7-26.


De Dreu, C.K.W. (2008). The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: Food for (pessimistic) thought. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 5-18.


De Dreu, C.K.W., & Weingart, L.R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance and team satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.


DeStephen, R.S., & Hirokawa, R.Y. (1988). Small group consensus: Stability of group support of the decision, task process, and group relationships. Small Group Behavior, 19, 227-239.


Erb, H., Hilton, D. J., Bohner, G., & Roffey, L. (2015). The minority decision ‚ÄĒ A risky choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 43-50.


Gelfand, M. J., Major, V. S., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L. H., & O’Brien, K. (2006). Negotiating relationally: The dynamics of the relational self in negotiations. Academy of Management Review, 31, 427-451.


Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1996). Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole, Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 55‚Äď80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.


Gouran, D.S. (1982). Making decisions in groups. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interper- sonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.


Hogg, M.A. & Vaughan, G.M. (2005). Social psychology (4th edn). London: Person-Prentice Hall.


Janis, I.L. (1972), Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos (2nd edn). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.


Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282.


Keshet, S., Kark, R., Pomerantz-Zorin, L., Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J (2006). Gender, status and the use of power strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 105-117.


Kolbe, M., & Boos, M. (2009). Facilitating Group Decision-Making: Facilitator¬īs subjective theories on group coordination. Forum Qualitative Socialforschung vol 10, No 1.


Kong, D. T., Konczak, L. J., & Bottom, W. P. (2015). Team performance as a joint function of team member satisfaction and agreeableness. Small Group Research, 46(2), 160-178.


Kray, L.J., Reb, J., Galisky, A.D., & Thompson, L. (2004). Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 399-411.


Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (2005). Gender stereotypes and negotiation performance: An examination of theory and research. Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, vol 26. (pp. 103-182).


Kray, L.J, Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942-958.


Larson, J. R., Jr., Christensen, C., Franz, T. M., & Abbott, A. S. (1998). Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 93-108.


Latan√©, B., & L’Herrou, T. (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1218-1230.


Levine, J. M., & Tindale, R. S. (2015). Social influence in groups. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 2: Group processes. (pp. 3-34) American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.


Löfstrand, P., & Zakrisson, I. (2014). Competitive versus non-competitive goals in group decision-making. Small Group Research, 45(4), 451-464.


Mason, C. M., & Griffin, M.A. (2002). Group task satisfaction: Applying the construct of job satisfaction to groups. Small Group Research, 22, 271-312.


Mason. C.M.,& Griffin, M.A. (2003). Identifying group task satisfaction at work. Small Group Research 34:413 413-435.


Mast, M. S. (2002). Female dominance hierarchies: Are they any different from males’? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 29-39.


Meyers, R.A., Brashers, D.E., Winston, L & Grob, L (1997). Sex differences and group argument: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation. Communication studies, 48, 19-41.


Meyers, R.A., & Brashers, D.E. (2010). Extending the conversational argument coding scheme: Argument categories, units and coding procedures. Communication Methods and Measures, 4, 27-45.


Meyers, R. A., Brashers, D. E., & Hanner, J. (2000). Majority-minority influence: Identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument-outcome links. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 3-30.


Michie, S. & Williams, S. (2003). Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review. Occupational& Environmental Medicine. 60(1), 3-9.


Mueller, C. A. (2010). Influence of transformational leadership style on decisionmaking style and technology readiness: A correlation study. ProQuest Information & Learning.


Myers, C. D. (2012). Information use in small group deliberation (Order No. AAI3480116).


Ostrom, E. (2003). Toward a behavioral theory linking trust, reciprocity, and reputation. Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research. (pp. 19-79) New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.


Peeters, M. A. G., Rutte, C. G., V an Tuijl, Harrie F. J. M., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). The big five personality traits and individual satisfaction with the team. Small Group Research, 37(2), 187-211.


Peterson, R., Owens, P., Tetlock, P.E., Fan, E. & Martorana, P. (1998). Group dynamics in top management teams: Groupthink, vigilance, and alternative models of failure and success in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 77-99.


Pratto, F., & Stewart, A. L. (2012). Group dominance and the half-blindness of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 28-45.


Schmid, P. C., Mast, M. S., Bombari, D., & Mast, F. W. (2011). Gender effects in information processing on a nonverbal decoding task. Sex Roles, 65(1-2), 102-107.


Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R., & Ragan, J.W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil¬īs advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 745-772.


Seibold, D.R., Meyers, R.A., (1996). Communication and influence in group decision making. In R.Y. Hirokawa & M.S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 242-268). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.


Seibold, D.R., Meyers, R.A., (2007) Group argument: A Structuration perspective and research program. Small Group Research, 38, 312-336.


Simons, T., Pelled, L.P., & Smith, K.A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662-673.


Slotegraaf, R.J., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2011). Product development team stability and new product advantage: The role of decision-making processes. Journal of Marketing, 75, 96-108.


Spector, P. E. (1988), Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335‚Äď340.


Stewart, C. O., Setlock, L. D., & Fussell, S. R. (2007). Conversational argumentation in decision making: Chinese and U.S. participants in face-toface and instant-messaging interactions. Discourse Processes, 44(2), 113-139.


Tasa, K., & Whyte, G. (2005). Collective efficacy and vigilant problem solving in group decision making: A non-linear model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 119-129.


Wiiteman, H. (1991). Group member satisfaction: A conflict-related account. Small group research, 22, 24.


Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 323-345.

Independent in the heard: Inclusion and exclusion as social processes. Proceedings from the 9th GRASP conference, Linköping University, May 2014

Author:
Pär Löfstrand
Title:
Conversational Arguments in Small Group Decision Making: Reasoning Activity and Perceived Influence Over the Decision are Keys for Success
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21