Article | Proceedings of SIGRAD 2014, Visual Computing, June 12-13, 2014, Göteborg, Sweden | GPU-based ray-casting of non-rigid deformations: a comparison between direct and indirect approaches
Göm menyn

Title:
GPU-based ray-casting of non-rigid deformations: a comparison between direct and indirect approaches
Author:
Filipe Marreiros: Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University/Department of Science and Technology (ITN) - Media and Information Technology (MIT) , Linköping University, Sweden Örjan Smedby: Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University/Department of Science and Technology (ITN) - Media and Information Technology (MIT) , Linköping University/Department of Radiology (IMH), Linköping University, Sweden
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2014
Conference:
Proceedings of SIGRAD 2014, Visual Computing, June 12-13, 2014, Göteborg, Sweden
Issue:
106
Article no.:
009
Pages:
67-74
No. of pages:
8
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2014-10-30
ISBN:
978-91-7519-212-3
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

For ray-casting of non-rigid deformations, the direct approach (as opposed to the traditional indirect approach) does not require the computation of an intermediate volume to be used for the rendering step. The aim of this study was to compare the two approaches in terms of performance (speed) and accuracy (image quality). The direct and the indirect approach were carefully implemented to benefit of the massive GPU parallel power, using CUDA. They were then tested with Computed Tomography (CT) datasets of varying sizes and with a synthetic image, the Marschner-Lobb function. The results show that the direct approach is dependent on the ray sampling steps, number of landmarks and image resolution. The indirect approach is mainly affected by the number of landmarks, if the volume is large enough. These results exclude extreme cases, i.e. if the sampling steps are much smaller than the voxel size and if the image resolution is much higher than the ones used here. For a volume of size 512Ă—512Ă—512, using 100 landmarks and image resolution of 1280Ă—960, the direct method performs better if the ray sampling steps are approximately above 1 voxel. Regarding accuracy, the direct method provides better results for multiple frequencies using the Marschner-Lobb function. The conclusion is that the indirect method is superior in terms of performance, if the sampling along the rays is high, in comparison to the voxel grid, while the direct is superior otherwise. The accuracy analysis seems to point out that the direct method is superior, in particular when the implicit function is used.

Proceedings of SIGRAD 2014, Visual Computing, June 12-13, 2014, Göteborg, Sweden

Author:
Filipe Marreiros, Örjan Smedby
Title:
GPU-based ray-casting of non-rigid deformations: a comparison between direct and indirect approaches
References:

[Boo89] BOOKSTEIN F.: Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11 (1989), 567–585. 3

[CBC*01] CARR J. C., BEATSON R. K., CHERRIE J. B., MITCHELL T. J., FRIGHT W. R., MCCALLUM B. C., EVANS T. R.: Reconstruction and representation of 3d objects with radial basis functions. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (New York, NY, USA, 2001), SIGGRAPH ’01, ACM, pp. 67–76. 3

[CHM03] CHEN H., HESSER J., MANNER R.: Raycasting freeform deformed-volume objects. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 14 (2003), 61–72. 2, 6

[CSC10] CORREA C. D., SILVER D., CHEN M.: Constrained illustrative volume deformation. Computer & Graphics 34 (2010), 370–377. 2

[CSW03] CHEN M., SILVER D., WINTER A. S., SINGH V., CORNEA N.: Spatial transfer functions - a unified approach to specifying deformation in volume modeling and animation. Proceedings of volumegraphics’03, pp. 35–44. 2

[Cud10] Nvidia cuda c programming guide, version 3.1, 2010. 1, 2

[FRS01] FORNEFETT M., ROHR K., STIEHL H.: Radial basis functions with compact support for elastic registration of medical images. Image and Vision Computing 19 (2001), 87–96. 6

[FSRR00] FANG S., SRINIVASAN R., RAGHAVAN R., RICHTSMEIER J. T.: Volume morphing and rendering - an integrated approach. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 17 (January 2000), 59–81. 2, 6

[Gib97] GIBSON S. F.: 3d chainmail:a fast algorithm for deforming volumetric objects. Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on interactive 3D graphics. 2

[HLSR09] HADWIGER M., LJUNG P., SALAMA C. R., ROPINSKI T.: Eurographics 2009 course notes: Gpu-based volume raycasting with advanced illumination. In Eurographics 2009 course (2009), Eurographics 2009. 2

[KW03] KRĂśGER J., WESTERMANN R.: Acceleration Techniques for GPU-based Volume Rendering. In Proceedings IEEE Visualization 2003 (2003). 2

[KY97] KURZION Y., YAGEL R.: Interactive space deformation with hardware-assisted rendering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 17, 5 (1997), 66–77. 2

[LDS04] LEVIN D., DEY D., SLOMKA P. J.: Acceleration of 3d, nonlinear warping using standard video graphics hardware: implementation and initial validation. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 28, 8 (2004), 471–83. 2

[LMK03] LI W., MUELLER K., KAUFMAN A.: Empty space skipping and occlusion clipping for texture-based volume rendering. In Proc. IEEE Visualization 2003 (2003), pp. 317–324. 2

[LP00] LAPEER R., PRAGER R.: 3d shape recovery of a newborn skull using thin-plate splines. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 24 (2000), 193–204. 3

[LSR10] LAPEER R., SHAH S., R.S. R.: An optimised radial basis function algorithm for fast non-rigid registration of medical images. Computers in Biology and Medicine 40, 1 (2010), 1–7. 2, 6

[ML94] MARSCHNER S. R., LOBB R. J.: An evaluation of reconstruction filters for volume rendering. IEEE Visualization’94. 5

[MRH10] MENSMANN J., ROPINSKI T., HINRICHS K. H.: An advanced volume raycasting technique using gpu stream processing. In GRAPP: International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (Angers, 2010), INSTICC Press, pp. 190–198. 2

[NMK*05] NEALEN A., MĂśLLER M., KEISER R., BOXERMAN E., CARLSON M.: Physically based deformable models in computer graphics, 2005. 2

[RGW*03] RĂ–TTGER S., GUTHE S., WEISKOPF D., ERTL T., STRASSER W.: Smart hardware-accelerated volume rendering. In VisSym (2003). 2

[Row07] ROWLAND R. S.: Fast Registration of Medical Imaging Data Using Optimised Radial Basis Functions :PhD Dissertation. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, 2007. 2, 6

[San10] SANDERSON C.: Armadillo: An open source c++ linear algebra library for fast prototyping and computationally intensive experiments, 2010. 3

[Sig06] SIGG C.: Representation and rendering of implicit surfaces, 2006. 1

[WBSS04] WANG Z., BOVIK A. C., SHEIKH H. R., SIMONCELLI E. P.: Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13 (2004), 600–612. 6

[WRS01] WESTERMANN R., REZK-SALAMA C.: Real-time volume deformations. Computer Graphics Forum 20, 3 (2001). 2, 6

Proceedings of SIGRAD 2014, Visual Computing, June 12-13, 2014, Göteborg, Sweden

Author:
Filipe Marreiros, Örjan Smedby
Title:
GPU-based ray-casting of non-rigid deformations: a comparison between direct and indirect approaches
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21