Article | KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13 | Applying Eye-Tracking in Kansei Engineering Methodology for Design Evaluations in Product Development Link�ping University Electronic Press Conference Proceedings
Göm menyn

Title:
Applying Eye-Tracking in Kansei Engineering Methodology for Design Evaluations in Product Development
Author:
Markus Köhler: Metrology and Quality Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Björn Falk: Metrology and Quality Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Robert Schmitt: Metrology and Quality Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2014
Conference:
KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13
Issue:
100
Article no.:
070
Pages:
837-852
No. of pages:
16
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2014-06-11
ISBN:
978-91-7519-276-5
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

Customers base their emotional quality judgments on their product perception. Therefore; the aim of customer-centric product development should be to satisfy needs and requirements of the specific target group and to develop products that attract user attention and evoke positive emotions. Since visual impressions are crucial for the evaluation of the Perceived Product Quality; the ascertainment of data about visual impressions should be of high importance. To use Perceived Quality data of visual impression there is a need to investigate how latent needs and requirements are influencing the conscious and unconscious visual perception. This paper presents a methodology that extends the traditional Kansei Engineering methodology for gathering customers’ requirements and evaluations (e.g. questionnaires) by using Eye-Tracking. The elicitation of visual impressions with Eye-Tracking means to derive objective data of customers’ product perception and evaluation. The methodology uses comparisons of design alternatives on a general as well as on an even more detailed level of product perception based on a structured approach. The paper also presents precisely a study design for applying the developed methodology and shows valid results of a conducted Eye-Tracking study by using descriptive (e.g. Pareto-analysis) and statistical analysis procedures (e.g. repeated-measures ANOVA). In conclusion; knowledge about and interpretations of the customer product evaluation and about latent and implicit requirements can be derived from the parameters ascertained with Eye-Tracking (e.g. fixations). By gradually integrating the methodology into the product development process; it can be applied by product designers for evaluating product design concepts from the customer’s perspective.

Keywords: Kansei Engineering; Eye-Tracking; Perceived Quality; Design Evaluation; Product Development.

KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13

Author:
Markus Köhler, Björn Falk, Robert Schmitt
Title:
Applying Eye-Tracking in Kansei Engineering Methodology for Design Evaluations in Product Development
References:

Akao; Y. (1990). History of Quality Function Deployment in Japan. In; International Academy for Quality Books Series. Vol. 3. Hansa Publisher.

Backhaus; K.; Erichson; B.; Plinke; W.; & Weiber; R. (2003). Multivariate Analysemethoden: eine anwendungsorientiere Einführung. Berlin; Germany.

Beaujean; P.; Grob; R.; Häfen; K.; Köbler; E.; Köhler; M.; Quattelbaum; B.; Schmitt; R.; Seitz; R.; Wagner; M.; & Willach; A. (2011). Emotionale Produktgestaltung – Wert der wahrgenommenen Qualität. In; Brecher et al. (Eds.); Proceedings: Tagungsband zum AWK. Aachen; Germany.

Berghaus; N. (2005). Eye-Tracking im stationären Einzelhandel. Eine empirische Analyse der Wahrnehmung von Kunden am Point of Purchase. Dissertation. University of Duisburg-Essen; Germany.

Czerwinski; E.; Horvitz; M.; & Cutrell; E. (2001). Subjective duration assessment: An implicit probe for software usability. In; Proceedings of the IHM-HCI 2001 Conference; Vol. 2 (pp. 167-170).

Duchowski; A. T. (2007). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. London; United Kingdom: Springer.

Ehrlenspiel; K. (2009). Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe; Methodeneinsatz; Zusammenarbeit. Hanser.

Falk; B.; Quattelbaum; B.; & Schmitt; R. (2008). Product Quality from the Customers‘ Perspective – Systematic Elicitation and Deployment of Perceived Quality Information. In; G. Q. Huang; K.L. Mak & P.G. Maropoulos (Eds.); Proceedings of the 6th CIRP-Sponsored International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology (pp. 211-222).

Hammer; N.; & Lengyel; S. (1989). Do people perceive what the design expresses? In; Vihma; S. (ed). Semantic Visions in Design; the Symposium on Design Research and Semiotics; UIAH; Helsinki.

Hammer; N.; & Lengyel; S. (1991). Identifying Semantic Markers in Design Products: The Use of Eye-Movement Recordings in Industrial Design. In; Schmid; R. & Zambarbieri; D. (Eds.). Oculomotor Control and Cognitive Processes – Normal and Pathological Aspects. Elsevier Science; Amsterdam (pp. 445-455).

Hoeks; B.; & Levelt; W.J.M. (1993). Pupillary dilation as a measure of attention: A quantitative system analysis. In; Behavior Research Methods; Instruments; & Computers (pp. 16-26).

Hofer; N.; & Mayerhofer; W. (2010). Die Blickregistrierung in der Werbewirkungsforschung. Grundlagen und Ergebnisse. In; Der Markt; No. 49 (pp. 149).

Issing; L.; & Mikasch; H. (1986). Blickbewegung und Bildverarbeitung. Kognitionspsychologische Aspekte visueller Informationsverarbeitung. In J. Haack (Eds.); Blickbewegung und Bildverarbeitung (p. 18). Frankfurt am Main; Germany.

Kano; N. (1987). Attractive quality and must-be quality. In; J. of the Japanese Society for Quality Control.

Köhler; M.; Falk; B.; & Schmitt; R. (2013). Objectifying user attention caused by visually perceived product components. In; Proceedings of 16th International Congress of Metrology. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/metrology/201314002.

Köhler; M.; & Schmitt; R. (2012). Systematic Consumer Evaluation Measurement for Objectified Integration into the Product Development Process. In Y. G. Ji; Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design. CRC Press (pp. 503-512).

Koivunen; K.; Kukkonen; S.; Lahtinen; S.; Rantala; H. & Sharmin S. (2004). Towards Deeper Understnading of How People Perceive Design in Products. In; Proceedings of the Computer in Art and Design Education (CADE); Copenhagen.

Kukkonen; S. (2005). Exploring Eye Tracking in Design Evaluation. In; Proceedings of Joining Forces – International Conference on Design Research; Helsinki.

Lee; S.; Harada; A.; & Strappers; P. J. (2002). Pleasure with Products: Design based Kansei. In W. Green& P. Jordan (Eds.); Pleasure with Products: Beyond usability (p. 219). London; United Kingdom.

Mello-Thoms; C.; Nodine; C. F.; & Kundel; H. L. (2002). What attracts the eye to the location of missed and reported breast cancers?. In; Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium. ACM Press (pp. 111-117). New York; USA.

Nagamachi; M. (1989). Kansei engineering. Tokyo; Japan: Kaibundo.

Nagamachi; M. (2011). Kansei/Affective Engineering. Florida; USA: CRC.

Nielsen; J.; & Levy; J. (1994). Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. In; Communications of the ACM 37. No. 4 (pp. 66-75).

Osgood; E. C.; Suci; G.J.; & Tannenbaum; P.H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana.

Saeed; K. (2012). Biometrics and Kansei Engineering. New York; NY: Springer.

Schmitt; R.; & Pfeifer; T. (2010). Qualitätsmanagement: Strategien – Methoden – Techniken. München; Germany: Carl Hanser.

Schmitt; R.; Köhler; M.; Durá; J.; & Diaz-Pineda; J. (2013). Objectifying User Attention and Emotion Evoked by Relevant Perceived Product Components. In; Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Measurement Technology and Intelligent Instruments ISMTII.

Schmitt; R.; Quattelbaum; B.; & Lieb; H. (2008). Perceived quality as a key factor for strategic change in product development. In; IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (pp. 311-316). New Jersey; USA.

Schütte; S. (2002). Designing Feelings into Products – Integrating Kansei Engineering Methodology in Product Development. Institute of Technology; Department of Mechanical Engineering. Linköping; Sweden.

Schütte; S. (2005). Engineering Emotional Values in Product Design – Kansei Engineering in Development. Dissertation. Institute of Technology; Department of Mechanical Engineering. Linköping; Sweden.

Stern; J.A.; Boyer; D.;& Schroeder; D. (1994). Blink rate: a possible measure of fatigue. In; Human Factors 362 (pp. 285-297).

Van Someren; M. W.; Bernard; Y. F.; & Sandberg; F. (1994). The think aloud method: a practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London; United Kingdom: Academic Press.

Yarbus; A. L. (1967). Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press.

Young; L.R.; & Sheena; D. (1975). Survey of eye movement recording methods. In; Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation. Volume 7 (pp. 397-429).

KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13

Author:
Markus Köhler, Björn Falk, Robert Schmitt
Title:
Applying Eye-Tracking in Kansei Engineering Methodology for Design Evaluations in Product Development
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2018-9-11