Keywords: Design activity; design process; affective design; design intention; designer interaction
KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Link√∂ping; Sweden; June 11-13
BOUJUT; J. F. & BLANCO; E. 2003. Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW); 12; 205-219.
ECKERT; C. & BOUJUT; J. F. 2003. The role of objects in design co-operation: communication through physical or virtual objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW); 12; 145-151.
HENDERSON; K. 1991. Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication; conscription devices; and boundary objects in design engineering. Science; technology & human values; 16; 448.
HUTCHBY; I. & WOOFFITT; R. 2008. Conversation analysis; Cambridge: Polity.
NAGAMACHI; M. & LOKMAN; A. M. 2011. Innovations of kansei engineering. Industrial innovation series Kansei engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
NORMAN; D. A. 2005. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things; Basic Books.
SNIDER; J. G. & OSGOOD; C. E. 1969. Semantic differential technique : a sourcebook; Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.
STAR; S. L. & GRIESEMER; J. R. 1989. Institutional Ecology; ’Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology; 1907-39. Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications; Ltd.); 19; 387-420.
VINCK; D. & JEANTET; A. 1995. Mediating and commissioning objects in the sociotechnical process of product design: A conceptual approach. Management and new technology: Design; networks and strategies; 2; 111-129.