Article | KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13 | User Experience in the Threshold Matrix of Public Space: Design Intervention in a Complex Environment
Göm menyn

Title:
User Experience in the Threshold Matrix of Public Space: Design Intervention in a Complex Environment
Author:
Awoniyi Stephen: Texas State University, U.S.A.
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2014
Conference:
KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13
Issue:
100
Article no.:
015
Pages:
199-213
No. of pages:
15
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2014-06-11
ISBN:
978-91-7519-276-5
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

Designers seek to create environments that offer their inhabitants comfortable; desirable; meaningful or other qualified positive forms of experience. In some successful models; solutions involve a synthesis of space and person; such that they are mutually constitutive. Often as well; models involve an understanding of space; person and their union as dynamic. Models of space design which recognize such a dynamic relationship are said to view space as relational. In this paper; we claim space as relational. We also present the case that emergent in actualizing the relational idiom is the idea of threshold. Threshold is many things and complex. It symbolizes crossing but also pause; end but also beginning; a brief moment but also extended duration. In the paper; we explore the concept of threshold within physical; perceptual and rational frames. We attempt to foster a rich awareness of threshold; link it to a fertile; generative picture of public space; connect it to enrichment of inhabitants’ experience of the city and articulate roles for the designer. City and cultural spaces have pleasures embedded in the idea of threshold. Through analysis and intervention the designer can tap into those pleasures for the benefit of the user.

Keywords: Threshold; affect; complexity; public space

KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13

Author:
Awoniyi Stephen
Title:
User Experience in the Threshold Matrix of Public Space: Design Intervention in a Complex Environment
References:

Anderson; J. (2012). Relational places: The surfed wave as assemblage and convergence. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space; 30; 570-587.


Barnes; J. (Ed.). (1984). The complete works of Aristotle (Volume Two); Princeton; NJ: Princeton University Press.


Bernardes; J. D. (2010). Limit and utopia: Revisiting the beach as a threshold. Journal of Visual Art Practice; 9(3); 219-230.


Boeri; S. (2000). Notes for a research program; In R. Koolhaas; S. Boeri; S. Kwinter; N. Tazi & H. U. Obrist (Eds.). Mutations (pp. 356-377). Barcelona: ACTAR.


Borden; I. (1998). Body architecture: Skateboarding and the creation of super-architectural space. In J. Hill (Ed.); Occupying architecture: Between the architect and the user (pp. 195-216). London: Routledge.


Brighenti; A. M. (2009b). Walled urbs to urban walls--and return? On the social life of walls. In A. M. Brighenti (Ed.); The wall and the city (pp. 63-71). On-line; Professional Dreamers. Retrieved October 30; 2013; from http://www.professionaldreamers.net/?cat=3


Burns; A. (2000). Emotion and urban experience: Implications for design. Design Issues; 16(3); 67-79.


Camponeschi; C. (2010). The enabling city: Place-based creative problem-solving and the power of the everyday. (On line). Retrieved January 23; 2014 from http://enablingcity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/EC-EN.pdf


Cilliers; P. (2001). Boundaries; hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management; 5(5); 135-147.


Cilliers; P. (2007). Why we cannot know complex things completely. In F. Capra; A. Juarrero; P. Sotolongo & J. van Uden (Eds.); Reframing complexity: Perspectives from the north and south (pp. 81-89). Mansfield; MA; USA: ISCE.


Csikszentmihalyi M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.


Dant; T. (2005). Materiality and society. Maidenhead; Berkshire; UK: Open University Press.


Franck; K.; & Stevens; Q. (2007). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. Milton Park; Oxon: Routledge.


Giuliani; M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In M. Bonnes; T. Lee & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.); Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 135-170). Aldershot; Hants; UK: Ashgate.


Goodwin; R. (2003-2005a). Porosity. Retrieved February 8; 2013 from http://richard-goodwin.com/web/rg/porosity/


Goodwin; R. (2003-2005b). Porosity: The revision of public space in the city using public art to test the functional boundaries of built form.


Ingold; T. (2005). Up; across and along. 5th International Space Syntax Symposium. Retrieved September 30; 2013 from http://www.spacesyntax.tudelft.nl/longpapers1.html


Ingold; T. (2006). Up; across and along. In E. Naripea; V. Sarapik & J. Tomberg (Eds.); Koht ja Paik/Place and Location: Studies in Environmental Aesthetics and Semiotics V (pp. 21-36). Tallinn: Research Group of Cultural and Literary Theory/Estonian Literary Museum Institute of Art History/Estonian Academy of Arts/Estonian Semiotics Association. Retrieved January 24; 2014 from http://www.eki.ee/km/place/koht_5.htm


Jones; M. (2009). Phase space: Geography; relational thinking; and beyond. Progress in Human Geography; 33(4); 487-506.


Kuhn; T. S. (1970/1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


Lövheim; H. (2012). A new three-dimensional model for emotions and monoamine neurotransmitters. Medical Hypotheses; 78; 341-348.


Massey; D. (2006). Space; time and political responsibility in the midst of global inequality. Erdkunde; 60(2); 89-95.


Mieville; C. (2009). The city and the city. New York: Ballantine.


Mugerauer; R. (1993). Toward an architectural vocabulary: The porch as a between. In D. Seamon (Ed.); Dwelling; seeing; and designing: Toward a phenomenological ecology (pp. 103-128). Albany; NY: State University of New York Press.


Nathanson; D. L. (1992). Shame and pride: Affect; sex; and the birth of the self. New York: W. W. Norton.


Nathanson; D. L. (2008). Prologue: Affect imagery consciousness. In Tomkins; S. S.; Affect imagery consciousness: The complete edition (Book One) (pp. xi-xxvi). New York: Springer/The Silvan S. Tomkins Institute. e-book (on-line). Retrieved December 2013-January 2014 from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/txstate/Doc?id=10265325


Norberg-Schulz; C.; (1988). Architecture: Meaning and place: Selected essays. New York: Electa/Rizzoli


Poetry and possibility. (1991). In M. J. Valdes (Ed.); A Ricoeur reader (pp. 448-462). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.


Radding; C. M.; & Clark; W. W. (1992). Medieval architecture; medieval learning. New Haven; CT: Yale University Press.


Rapoport; A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Beverly Hills; CA: Sage.


Rowe; C.; & Slutzky; R. (1963). Transparency: Literal and phenomenal. Perspecta; 8; 45-54.


Stavrides; S. (2010). Towards the city of thresholds. On-line; Professional Dreamers. Retrieved October 30; 2013; from http://www.professionaldreamers.net/_prowp/wp-content/uploads/978-88-904295-3-8.pdf


Stevens; Q. (2007). The ludic city: Exploring the potential of public spaces. London: Routledge.


Strang; V. (2005). Common senses: Water; sensory experience and the generation of meaning. Journal of Material Culture; 10(1); No. 1; 92-120.


Teyssot; G. (2005). A topology of thresholds. Home Cultures; 2(1); 89-116.


Tomkins; S. S. (2008). Affect imagery consciousness: The complete edition (Book One). New York: Springer/The Silvan S. Tomkins Institute. e-book (on-line). Retrieved December 2013-January 2014 from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/txstate/Doc?id=10265325


Turner; V. W. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.


Urilift (n.d.). Retrieved January 25; 2014 from http://www.urilift.com/products.php


(La) Varra; G. (2000). Post-it city: The other European public spaces. In R. Koolhaas; S. Boeri; S. Kwinter; N. Tazi & H. U. Obrist (Eds.). Mutations (pp. 426-431). Barcelona: ACTAR.


Vermaas; P. E.; & Houkes; W. (2006). Use plans and artefact functions: An intentionalist approach to artefacts and their use. In A. Costall & O. Dreier (Eds.); Doing things with things: The design and use of everyday objects (pp. 29-48). Aldershot; Hampshire; UK: Ashgate.


Viljoen; H.; & van der Merwe; C. N. (2007). (Eds.). Beyond the threshold: Explorations of liminality in literature. New York: Peter Lang.


(de) Waal; M. (2008). Towards a Myspace urbanism. Retrieved December 21; 2013 from http://www.themobilecity.nl/2008/12/22/towards-a-myspace-urbanism/
Watson; M. (2003). Performing place in nature reserves. In B. Szerszynski; W. Heim & C. Waterton (Eds.); Nature performed: Environment; culture and performance (pp. 145‚Äď160). Oxford: Blackwell/Sociological Review.


Weber; S. (2003). ‚ÄúStreets; squares; theaters‚ÄĚ: A city on the move--Walter Benjamin‚Äôs Paris.


Boundary; 30(1); 17-30. Retrieved January 25; 2013.


Wirth; L. (1969). Urbanism as a way of life. In R Sennett (Ed.); Classic essays on the culture of cities (pp. 143-164). (H. H. Gerth; & C. W Mills; Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts/Meredith. (Original translation published 1938)

KEER2014. Proceedings of the 5th Kanesi Engineering and Emotion Research; International Conference; Linköping; Sweden; June 11-13

Author:
Awoniyi Stephen
Title:
User Experience in the Threshold Matrix of Public Space: Design Intervention in a Complex Environment
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21