Keywords: Service design; Organizational transformation; Emergence; Complexity; Imagineering
ServDes.2014 Service Future; Proceedings of the fourth Service Design and Service Innovation Conference; Lancaster University; United Kingdom; 9-11 April 2014
Banathy; B. H.; (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Plenum Press.
Bruner; J. (1986). Actual minds; possible worlds. Cambridge; MA: Harvard University Press.
Ciborra; C. (1995). The platform organization: Recombining strategies; structures; and surprises. Organization Science; 7(2); 1-16.
Corning; P. A. (2012). The re-emergence of emergence; and the causal role of synergy in emergent evolution. Synthese; 185(2); 295-317.
Csikszentmihalyi; M. (1999). Implications of a system perspective for the study of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.); Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
George; JM (2007). Chapter 9: Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals; 1(1); 439‚Äď77.
Goldstein; J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence: A journal of complexity issues in organizations and management; 1(1); 49-72.
Junginger; S. & Sangiorgi; D. (2009). Service design and organizational change. Bridging the gap between rigor and relevance. Proceedings of the 3rd IASDR Conference on Design Research; Seoul; South Korea: Korean Society of Design Science.
Kahane. A. (2012). Transformative scenario planning: Working together to change the future; San Francisco: Berrett-KoehlerPublishers.
Kimbell; L. (2009). The turn to service design. In J. Gulier & L. Moor (Eds.); Design and creativity: Policy; management and practice (pp.157-173). Oxford: Berg.
Loasby; B. (2007). Appropriability; proximity; routines and innovations; Imagination and order. Druid Summer Conference.
Marion; R. (2012). Leadership of Creativity: Entity-Based; Relational; and Complexity Perspectives. In M. Mumford; Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 457-482). San Diego; CA: Elsevier.
McKelvey; B. (2004). Toward a complexity science of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing; 19(3); 313-341.
Morelli; A. (2007). New representation techniques for designing in a systemic perspective. Conference Proceedings Design Inquiries; Stockholm.
Nijs; D. (In Press). Imagineering the Butterfly Effect: Transformation by Inspiration. Eleven International Publishing.
Ramirez; R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal; 20; 49-65.
Sangiorgi; D. (2009). Building a framework for service design research. In Proceedings of the 8th European Academy of Design International Conference (pp. 415-420); Aberdeen; Scotland: Robert Gordon University.
Sangiorgi; D. (2010). Transformative services and transformation design. International Journal of Design; .5(1); 29-40.
Sheth; J. & Uslay; C. (2007). Implications of the revised definition of marketing: From exchange to value creation; Journal of Public Policy & Marketing; 26; 302-307.
Sheth; J.N. & Sisodia; R.S. (2006). Does Marketing Need Reform?; Fresh Perspectives on the Future. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Stacey; R.D. (1995). The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal; 16( 6); 477-495.
Vargo; S. L. & Lusch; R.F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing; 68;.1-17.
Vargo; S. L. & Lusch; R.F. (2008). From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics. Industrial Marketing Management; 1-6.
West; B.J. (1985). An essay on the importance of being nonlinear. Issues 61-63; Springer-Verlag.
Wieland; H.; Polese; F.; Vargo; S.; & Lusch; R. (2012). Toward a service (eco)systems perspective on value creation. International Journal of Service Science; Management; Engineering and Technology; 3(3); 12-25.
Young; R. (2008). An integrated model of designing to aid the understanding of the complexity paradigm in design practice. Futures; 40(6); 562-576.