Article | Proceedings from the 50th Societas Ethica Annual Conference 2013. Climate Change; Sustainability; and an Ethics of an Open Future. August 22-25; 2013; Soesterberg; The Netherlands | Climate Change and Responsibility to Futere Generations: What Normative Questions Should we Address?
Göm menyn

Title:
Climate Change and Responsibility to Futere Generations: What Normative Questions Should we Address?
Author:
Robert Heeger: Utrecht University, Ethics Institute, The Netherlands
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2013
Conference:
Proceedings from the 50th Societas Ethica Annual Conference 2013. Climate Change; Sustainability; and an Ethics of an Open Future. August 22-25; 2013; Soesterberg; The Netherlands
Issue:
098
Article no.:
002
Pages:
17-24
No. of pages:
8
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2014-04-24
ISBN:
978-91-7519-289-5
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

This paper deals with the problem of moral responsibility i view of climate change. It assumes that we have a responsibility to future generations; and it inquires what this responsibility implies. The leading idea is that in order to determine what implications responsibility to future generations has; we need to consider what normative questions we should ask about climate change and about our response to it. Four normative questions are discussed. 1. How should we respond to uncertainty? Should we apply cost-benefit analysis in order to cope with uncertainty? 2. How should we evaluate the emission of greenhouse gases? Given that the effects of emissions will be bad; should we judge that we as emitters harm the receivers and by that do them an injustice? 3. How should we compare present costs and future benefits? Should we give little or much weight to the benefits and well-being of people in the further future? 4. How should we take heed of human rights? Should we try to avoid the adverse outcomes of a cost-benefit approach by adopting a human rights approach that specifies minimum thresholds to which all human beings are entitled?

Keywords: Uncertainty. Cost-benefit analysis. Duty of justice. Future benefits. Human rights approach

Proceedings from the 50th Societas Ethica Annual Conference 2013. Climate Change; Sustainability; and an Ethics of an Open Future. August 22-25; 2013; Soesterberg; The Netherlands

Author:
Robert Heeger
Title:
Climate Change and Responsibility to Futere Generations: What Normative Questions Should we Address?
References:

Broome; John. Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World. New York/London: W.W. Norton; 2012.


Gardiner; Stephen M.. A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Osford: Oxford University Press; 2011.


Caney; Simon. "Climate change; human rights and moral thresholds." Human Rights and Climate Change; edited by Stephen Humphreys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010; pp. 69-90.


Caney; Simon and Cameron Hepburn. "Carbon Trading: Unethical; Unjust and Inefficient?" Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69 (2011); pp. 201-234.


Nordhaus; William. A Question of Balance. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2009.


Stern; Nicholas. The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.


Shue; Henry. "Climate Hope: Implementing the Exit Strategy." Chicago Journal of International Law 13:2 (2013); pp. 381-402.

Proceedings from the 50th Societas Ethica Annual Conference 2013. Climate Change; Sustainability; and an Ethics of an Open Future. August 22-25; 2013; Soesterberg; The Netherlands

Author:
Robert Heeger
Title:
Climate Change and Responsibility to Futere Generations: What Normative Questions Should we Address?
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment


Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21