Keywords: Stochastic hybrid system; PDMP; dynamic reliability; state-dependent hazard rate; continuous time state-machine; Monte Carlo Simulation
Proceedings of the 10th International Modelica Conference; March 10-12; 2014; Lund; Sweden
Aldemir T (1991): Utilization of the Cell-to-Cell Mapping Technique to Construct Markov Failure Models for Process Control Systems, PSAM Proceedings, Elsevier Publishing Company Co. Inc., NY, pp 1431-1436.
Bouissou M., Jankovic M. (2012): Critical comparison of two user friendly tools to study Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes (PDMP). ESREL 2012, Helsinki.
Bouissou M., Chraibi H., Chubarova I. (2013): Critical comparison of two user friendly tools to study Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes (PDMP): season 2.
ESREL 2013, Amsterdam. Davis M.H.A (1993): Markov Models and Optimization, Chapman& Hall
Elmqvist H., Gaucher F., Mattsson S.E., Dupont F. (2012): State
Machines in Modelica. Modelica’2012 Conference, Munich,
Germany, Sept. 3-5, 2012. Download:
Elmqvist H., Mattsson S.E., Otter M. (2014): Modelica extensions for multi-mode DAE systems. Modelica’2014 Conference, Lund, Sweden, March 10-12.
Looye G., Joos H.D. (2006): Design of Autoland Controller Functions with Multi-objective Optimization. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 2,
March-April, pp. 475 -484.
Marseguerra M. and E. Zio (1996): Monte Carlo Approach to PSA for dynamic process system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 52:227-241.
Sheldon M.R. (1990): A course in simulation. Mc Millan, ISBN 0-02-403891-1
Tuffin B., D. S. Chen, and K. Trivedi (2001): Comparison of hybrid systems and fluid stochastic Petri nets. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 11 (1/2):77-95.
Zhang H., Dufour F., Dutuit Y., and Gonzalez K. (2008): Piecewise deterministic Markov processes and dynamic reliability. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 222(4), 545–551.
Zhang H., Saporta B., Dufoura F., and Deleuzed G. (2013): Dynamic Reliability by Using Simulink and Stateflow. Chemical Engineering Transactions. Vol. 33, pp. 529-534