Article | Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conference 2010; 14-15 April; Linköping; Sweden | User-Centric and Contextual Interaction in IPS<sup>2</sup>
Göm menyn

User-Centric and Contextual Interaction in IPS2
J. Dzaack: Technische Universit√§t Berlin, Franklinstr. 28-29, D-10587 Berlin, Germany B. Höge: Technische Universit√§t Berlin, Franklinstr. 28-29, D-10587 Berlin, Germany M. Rötting: Technische Universit√§t Berlin, Franklinstr. 28-29, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
Full text (pdf)
Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conference 2010; 14-15 April; Linköping; Sweden
Article no.:
No. of pages:
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
ISSN (online):
Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet

Export in BibTex, RIS or text

In the SFB/TR29 a focus lies on Human Factors and their integration into Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS2) to prevent errors and malfunction due to e.g. changing structures and conditions. Thus; it is necessary to integrate adaptive; contextual and user-centric interaction techniques into IPS2. In this article an approach is presented that enables the predictive and automatic detection of human errors and malpractice and their contextual prevention. Therefore cognitive user models; actual knowledge of the systems and the operator and multimodal human-machine interacting mechanisms are used. This approach provides the base for an efficient and error-free execution of services within IPS2.

Keywords: Industrial Product-Service Systems; Cognitive User Models; Multimodality; Error Prevention

Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conference 2010; 14-15 April; Linköping; Sweden

J. Dzaack, B. Höge, M. Rötting
User-Centric and Contextual Interaction in IPS2

[1] Meier; H.; Uhlmann; E.; Kortmann D.; 2005; Hybride Leistungsb√ľndel - Nutzenorientiertes Produktverst√§ndnis durch interferierende Sach- und Dienstleistungen. wt Werkstattstechnik online; 95. Jahrgang; 7/2005; S. 528-532; Springer-VDI-Verlag.

[2] Emery; F. E.; Trist; E. L.; 1960; Socio-technical systems. In C. W. Churchman and M. Verhust (Eds.): Management science; models and techniques. Vol. 2 (pp. 83-97). Oxford: Pergamon.

[3] Höge; B.; Schlatow; S.; & Rötting; M.; 2009; A Shared-Vision System for User Support in the Field of Micromanufacturing. In Proceedings of HCI International 2009 - Posters. 855-859. Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.

[4] Wickens; C. D. (1984). Engineering psychology and human performance. Gelnview; Illinois et al.: Scott Froseman and Company.

[5] Tack; H. W. (1995). Wege zu einer differentiellen kognitiven Psychologie. In Bericht √ľber den 39. Kongress; der Deutschen Gesellschaft f√ľr Psychologie in Hamburg; Hogrefe; 172-185.

[6] Pew; R. W.; Mavor; A. S.; 1998; Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior: Application to Military Simulations. National Academic Press; Washington D.C.

[7] Howes; A.; Young; R. M.; 1997; The role of cognitive architecture in modeling the user: Soar’s learning mechanism. Human-Computer Interaction 12; 4; 311-343.

[8] Dzaack; J.; 2008; Analyse kognitiver Benutzermodelle f√ľr die Evaluation von Mensch-Maschine- Systemen. Dissertation. Technische Universit√§t Berlin.

[9] Salvucci; D. D.; Lee; F. J.; 2003; Simple Cognitive Modeling in a Complex Cognitive Architecture. In S. Ashlund; K. Mullet; A. Henderson; E. Hollnagel & T. White (Eds.); Proc. of CHI 2003; ACM Press; 265- 272.

[10] Card; S. K.; Moran; T. P.; Newell; A.; 1983; The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum; Hillsdale; NJ.

[11] Meyer; D. E.; Kieras; D. E.; 1997; A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multipletask performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 104; 749-791.

[12] Anderson; J. R.; Bothell; D.; Byrne; M. D; Douglass; S.; Lebiere; C .; Qin; Y.; 2004; An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111; 1036-1060.

[13] Ritter; F. E.; Shadbolt; N. R.; Elliman; D.; Young; R. M.; Gobet; F.; Baxter; G. D.; 2003; Techniques for modeling human and organizational behavior in synthetic environments: A supplementary review. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base; OH: Human Systems Information Analysis Center.

[14] Dzaack; J.; Kiefer; J.; Urbas; L.; 2005; An approach towards multitasking in ACTR/PM. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACT-R Workshop; Trieste.

[15] Dzaack; J.; Trösterer; S.; Pape; N.; Urbas; L.; 2007; A computational model of retrospective time estimation. Cognitive Systems Research Special Issue 8; 3; 208-215.

[16] J√ľrgensohn; T.; 2002; Bedienermodellierung. In K.- P. Timpe; T. J√ľrgensohn & H. Kolrep (Eds.); Mensch-Maschine-Systemtechnik ‚Äď Konzepte; Modellierung; Gestaltung; Evaluation (pp. 107‚Äď148). D√ľsseldorf: Symposion Publishing.

[17] Berthold; A.; Jameson; A.; 1999; Interpreting symptoms of cognitive load in speech input. Proceedings of the seventh international conferenceon User modeling; p. 235 ‚Äď 244.

[18] Conati; C.; 2002; Probabilistic assessment of user’s emotions during the interaction with educational games. Applied Artificial Intelligence; 16; 555‚Äď575.

[19] Li; X.; Ji; Q.;2005; Active affective state detection and user assistance with dynamic bayesian networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems; Man and Cybernetics; 35; 2005.

[20] Ritter; F. R.; Haynes; S. R.; Cohen; M.; Howes; A.; John; B.; Best; B.; 2006; High-level Behavior Representation Languages Revisited. In Proc. ICCM ’06; Edizioni Goliardiche; 404-407.

[21] Matessa; M.; 2004; An ACT-R modeling framework for interleaving templates of human behavior. In Proc. 26th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; 903-908.

[22] St. Amant; R.; Ritter; F. E.; 2004; Specifying ACT-R models of user interaction with a GOMS language. Cognitive Systems Research; 6; 71-88.

[23] Heinath; M.; 2009; Entwicklung einer Simulationsumgebung zur Integration von Benutzermodellierungswerkzeugen in den Systementwicklungsprozess. Dissertation. Technische Universität Berlin.

[24] Dzaack; J.; Urbas; L.; 2009; Multilevel Analysis of Human Performance Models in Safety-Critical Systems. Proceedings of HCI International 2009 (DVD); San Diego.

[25] Favre; C.; 1996; Fly-by-wire for commercial aircraft: the Airbus experience. In Mark B. Tischler (Ed.) Advances in Aircraft Flight Control (pp 212-216). Taylor & Francis; London; UK.

[26] Bri√®re; D.; Traverse; P.; 1993; Airbus A320/A330/A340 electrical flight controls ‚Äď a family of fault-tolerant systems; Proc. 23rd IEEE Int. Symp. On Fault-Tolerant Computing (FTCS-23); Toulouse; France; 616-623.

[27] Bachfischer; K.; Bohnenberger; T.; Hofmann; M.;Wäller; C.; Wu; Y.; 2007; Kontext-adaptive Fahrerinformationssysteme am Beispiel eines
Navigationssystems. In KI - K√ľnstliche Intelligenz; 2007(3); 57-63.

[28] McGlaun; G.; Lang; M.; Rigoll; G. & Althoff; F. (2004); Kontextsensitives Fehlermanagement beimultimodaler Interaktion mit Infotainment- und Kommunikationseinrichtungen im Fahrzeug. Useware 2004: Nutzergerechte Gestaltung Technischer Systeme; D√ľsseldorf: VDI-Berichte Nr. 1837; 57-65.

[29] Wood; R.; 2007; Design Considerations for Robotic Welding Cell Safety. Welding Journal - New York; 86(7); 38-41.

Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conference 2010; 14-15 April; Linköping; Sweden

J. Dzaack, B. Höge, M. Rötting
User-Centric and Contextual Interaction in IPS2
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
No citations available at the moment

Responsible for this page: Peter Berkesand
Last updated: 2017-02-21