3:e Utvecklingskonferensen f√∂r Sveriges ingenj√∂rsutbildningar; 30 november - 1 december; Campus Norrk√∂ping; Link√∂pings universitet
 J. Liu; D. T. Pysarchik; and W. W. Taylor; ‚ÄúPeer review in the classroom;‚ÄĚ BioScience; vol. 52; no. 9; pp. 824‚Äď829; Sep. 2002.
 L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa; ‚ÄúThe role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education;‚ÄĚ Journal of Engineering Education; vol. 94; pp. 121‚Äď130; Jan. 2005.
 A. Hofstein and V. N. Lunetta; ‚ÄúThe role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research;‚ÄĚ Review of Educational Research; vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 201‚Äď217; 1982.
 ‚ÄĒ‚ÄĒ; ‚ÄúThe laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twentyfirst century;‚ÄĚ Science Education; vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 28‚Äď54; Dec. 2004.
 J. C. Colosi and C. R. Zales; ‚ÄúJigsaw cooperative learning improves biology lab courses;‚ÄĚ BioScience; vol. 48; no. 2; pp. 118‚Äď124; Feb. 1998.
 K. Topping; ‚ÄúPeer assessment between students in colleges and universities;‚ÄĚ Review of Educational Research; vol. 68; no. 3; pp. 249‚Äď276; 1998.
 P. A. Kirschner and M. A. M. Meester; ‚ÄúThe laboratory in higher science education: Problems; premises and objectives;‚ÄĚ Higher Education; vol. 17; pp. 81‚Äď98; 1988.
 B. H. W. Yung; ‚ÄúThree views of fairness in a school-based assessment scheme of practical work in biology;‚ÄĚ International Journal of Science Education; vol. 23; no. 10; pp. 985‚Äď1005; Oct. 2001.
 K. J. Topping and S. W. Ehly; ‚ÄúPeer assisted learning: A framework for consultation;‚ÄĚ Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation; vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 113‚Äď132; Jun. 2001.
 N. Trautmann; ‚ÄúInteractive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports;‚ÄĚ Educational Technology Research and Development; vol. 57; no. 5; pp. 685‚Äď704; Oct. 2009.
 N. J. Pelaez; ‚ÄúProblem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology.‚ÄĚ Advances in physiology education; vol. 26; pp. 174‚Äď184; Dec. 2002.
 D. E. Berry and K. L. Fawkes; ‚ÄúConstructing the Components of a Lab Report Using Peer Review;‚ÄĚ Journal of Chemical Education; vol. 87; no. 1; pp. 57‚Äď61; Jan. 2010.