Article | 3:e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar; 30 november - 1 december; Campus Norrköping; Linköpings universitet | Reflections on student opinions before and after the final exam - The variability of questionnaires

Title:
Reflections on student opinions before and after the final exam - The variability of questionnaires
Author:
Claes Niklasson: Chemical Reaction Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2012
Conference:
3:e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar; 30 november - 1 december; Campus Norrköping; Linköpings universitet
Issue:
075
Article no.:
005
Pages:
21-27
No. of pages:
7
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2012-06-26
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet


Student course evaluations are important tools for direct evaluation of student appreciation of courses. At Chalmers they are traditionally executed in terms of mid meeting with students and teachers followed by a written student questionnaire and the follow up meeting with students; student centre representatives and teachers where recommendations for future development can/will be suggested. The written questionnaire is considered as the hard and true facts about the perception of the course quality from a student point of view. The year 2010 we tried to take a footprint on the questionnaire responses before the examination and compare that with the responses after the examination. Preliminary results indicate that the response for the course questionnaire show significant differences indicating that the examination for somewhat reason has changed the perception of the teacher’s pedagogic ability and general perception of the course. This paper will show the interesting results on this but also show how to use repeated questions to check if the student opinion also changes during the filling of the questionnaire. Chalmers has in many ways a very good way of evaluating courses and programs but here will suggestions for further improvement and quality assurance of the courses be suggested. The aim of this paper is not to provide solutions but to discuss problems and opportunities with written questionnaires as one important source for quality assurance of courses.

3:e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar; 30 november - 1 december; Campus Norrköping; Linköpings universitet

Author:
Claes Niklasson
Title:
Reflections on student opinions before and after the final exam - The variability of questionnaires
References:
No references available

3:e Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar; 30 november - 1 december; Campus Norrköping; Linköpings universitet

Author:
Claes Niklasson
Title:
Reflections on student opinions before and after the final exam - The variability of questionnaires
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment