Keywords: Design; Capability; Designerly well-being; Curriculum change
PATT 26 Conference; Technology Education in the 21st Century; Stockholm; Sweden; 26-30 June; 2012
Baynes; K. (2009). Models of change: the impact of ‚Äėdesignerly thinking‚Äô on people‚Äôs lives and the environment. Seminar 1: modelling and intelligence (Vol. Occasional Paper 3). Loughborough: University of Loughborough.
Berger; R. (2003). An ethic of excellence: Building a culture of craftsmanship with students. Portsmouth; NH: Heinemann.
DfE. (2011). The Framework for the National Curriculum: A report by the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum review. London.
DCSF/QCA; (2007). The National Curriculum: Statutory requirements for key stages 3 and 4. London: QCA
DES/WO. (1988). National Curriculum Design and Technology Working Group interim report. London: Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office.
Design Commission (2011). Restarting Britain; Design Education and Growth. London; Policy Connect
de Vries; M. J. (2011). Positioning Technology Education in the Curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
de Vries; M. J.; & Mottier; I. (Eds.). (2006). International Handbook of Technology Education: Reviewing the past twenty years. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
DfE; (2011). The Framework for the National Curriculum. A report by the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum review. (London: Department for Education).
Henley; D. (2012). Cultural education in England: An independent review by Darren Henley for the Department for Culture; Media and Sport and the Department for Education. London: DCMS/DFE.
James; O. (2007). Affluenza: how to be successful and stay sane. London: Vermilion.
Kelly; A. V.; Kimbell; R. A.; Patterson; V. J.; Saxton; J.; & Stables; K. (1987). Design and technology: A framework for assessment. London: HMSO.
Kimbell; R.; Stables; K.; Wheeler; T.; Wozniak; A.; & Kelly; A. V. (1991). The assessment of performance in design and technology. London: SEAC / HMSO.
Kimbell; R.; & Stables; K. (2007). Researching design learning : issues and findings from two decades of research and development. Berlin: Springer
Miller; D. (2011). What‚Äôs Wrong with DT? London: RSA
Norman; E.; Stables; K.; & Baynes; K. (2010). Design education: nurturing the designerly but at what cost?. Technological Learning & Thinking. Retrieved 2012-01-02; from http:// m1.cust.educ.ubc.ca/conference/index.php/TLT/2010/paper/view/119
Nussbaum; M. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ofsted. (2011). Meeting technological challenges? Design and technology in schools 2007‚Äď10. London: Ofsted.
Ofsted. (2012). Making a mark: art; craft and design education 2008/11. London: Ofsted.
P√∂ll√§nen; S. (2009). Contextualising craft: Pedagogical models for craft education. International Journal of Art and Design Education Vol 28.3. (pp 249-260). London: NSEAD/ Blackwell
Sen; A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Sj√∂berg; B. (2009). Design Theory and Design Practice in Sloyd Education. InternationalJournal of Art and Design Education Vol 28.1. (pp 71-81). London: NSEAD/Blackwell Whitehead; A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: The Free Press. 433