PATT 26 Conference; Technology Education in the 21st Century; Stockholm; Sweden; 26-30 June; 2012
√Ökerlind; G.S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods; Higher Education Research and Development; Vol. 24; pp. 321-334.
Ashworth; P. and Lucas; U. (2000). Achieving empathy and engagement; A practical approach to the + design; conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research; Studies in Higher Education; Taylor Francis; Vol 25:3; 295-308.
Barlex; D. (2008). STEM - can we still be cheerful? DATA news February 2008; DATA:Wellesbourne.
Barlex; D. (2009). The STEM Programme in England ‚Äď help or hindrance for design & technology education? PATT22 Conference; Delft; Netherlands; Available at: http://www. iteaconnect.org/Conference/PATT/PATT22/Barlex.pdf
BERA (2011). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research; Available at: http://www.bera. ac.uk/publications/ethical-guidelines
Bowden; J. and Green; P. (eds) (2005). Doing Developmental Phenomenography; RMIT University Press; Melbourne.
Walsh. E. (1994). Phenomenographic analysis of interview transcripts; In Bowden; J. and Walsh; E. (eds) Phenomenographic research; variations in method (p17-30) The Warburton Symposium; Melbourne; The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.
DFE (Department for Education) (2010). The Importance of Teaching; Available from: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationdetail/page1/CM%20 7980
DFE (Department for Education) (2011). Training our next Generation of Outstanding Teachers; Available from: http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/careers/ traininganddevelopment/a0078019/training-outstanding-teachers.
DFE (Department for Education) (2011). The STEM cohesion programme: Final report; Available at: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DFE-RR147. pdf
DES (Department for Education and Skills) (1988). Terms of reference of the Design and Technology Working Group National.
Fazey; J.A. and Marton; F. (2002). Understanding the Space of Experiential Variation; Active Learning in Higher Education 3; 234; Available from: http://alh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/ abstract/3/3/234;
Hardy; G. Howes; A. Spendlove; D. and Wake; G. (2008). Opportunities to confront and cross subject boundaries: Trainee teachers‚Äô perceptions of the differences and interrelationships between STEM subjects; Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference; Heriot-Watt University; Edinburgh.
Kvale; S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to Qualitative research Interviewing; Sage Publications;Thousand Oaks; California.
Lewis; T. Barlex; D. Chapman C. and Christer; K. (2007). Investigating interaction between science and D&T (D&T) in the secondary school ‚Äď a case study approach; Research in Science and Technology Education; 25; 1; 37-58 Routledge; UK.
Mannion; K. and Coldwell; M. (2008). After-school Science and Engineering Clubs Evaluation: Final Report; Available from: https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/ standard/publicationdetail/page1/DCSF-RW071
Marton; F. (1994). Phenomenography; in T.Husen and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds) International Encyclopaedia of Education; Vol. 8; second edition: 4424-29; Oxford: Pergamon
Marton; F. (2000). The structure of awareness; in J. Bowden and E. Walsh (eds); Phenomenography; Melbourne: RMIT University Press
Marton; F. and Booth; S. (1997). Learning and Awareness Mahwah; New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pitt; J. (2009). Blurring the Boundaries ‚Äď STEM education and Education for Sustainable Development; D&T Education; an International Journal; Vol 14; No 1.
Prosser; M. (1993). Phenomenography and the Principles and Practice of Learning; Higher Education Research and Development; Vol. 12(1):21-31.
Roberts; G. (2002). SET for success: The supply of people with science; technology; engineering and mathematics skills; Her Majesty‚Äôs Stationary Office (HMSO); London; Available from: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ent_res_roberts.htm
Sainsbury; D. (2007). The Race to the Top: A Review of Government‚Äôs Science and Innovation Policies; Her Majesty‚Äôs Stationary Office (HMSO); London; Available from: http://www.hmtreasury. gov.uk/sainsbury_index.htm
Sandburg; J. (1997). Are Phenomenographic results reliable?; Higher Education and Research Development; Vol16:2; 203-212.
Svensson; L. and Theman; (1983). The relation between categories of description and an interview protocol in a case of phenomenographic research; paper presented at: Second annual human science research conference.
Webb; G. (1997). Reconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of Phenomenography; Higher education Vol 3 (2):195-212.
Wellington; J. (2000). Education research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London; UK: Continuum.
Williams; J. (2011). STEM Education: Proceed with caution; D&T Education; an International Journal; Vol 16; No 1.