Article | Building National Museums in Europe 1750-2010. Conference proceedings from EuNaMus; European National Museums: Identity Politics; the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen; Bologna 28-30 April 2011. EuNaMus Report No. 1 | National Museums in Hungary

Title:
National Museums in Hungary
Author:
Péter Apor:
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2011
Conference:
Building National Museums in Europe 1750-2010. Conference proceedings from EuNaMus; European National Museums: Identity Politics; the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen; Bologna 28-30 April 2011. EuNaMus Report No. 1
Issue:
064
Article no.:
017
Pages:
401-424
No. of pages:
29
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2011-09-30
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

The national museums in Hungary are relatively easy to define. The term covers a set of institutions connected to a structure of state owned; centrally financed institutions; which came into existence during a process of expansion and specialization of the collections of the original Hungarian National Museum. The Hungarian National Museum (1803) was founded with the idea to follow the model of imperial capital Vienna as well as other major European capitals as an institution to foster national culture and civilization in the Kingdom of Hungary; which its elite considered a largely independent cultural and political unit within the Habsburg Empire. The museum; hence; was meant to promote national identity and all its subsequent expansions and branches were considered parts of a homogenous national culture and erudition. Consequently; governments and elites ordinarily stressed their connection to the state and the importance of central funding.

Through a systematic exploration of the main turning points in its history; the current report addresses the foundation of the National Museum in Hungary; its implications for its further development; the structure of ownership; the history of its collections; the process of professionalization both in terms of staff skills and the generation of specialized museums. Besides; it follows the trajectories of the various identities – national; civic; historical; revolutionary and communist – these museums intended to shape.

The National Museum was founded in the early 19th century as a civic; aristocratic and middle class initiative. Originally; it was owned by the nation; governed by a board of trustees and supervised by the imperial administration via its Hungarian commissioner; the Palatinus (nĂĄdor in Hungarian). Its collections were enriched by various private donations coming from various segments of the society; such as aristocratic or middle class urban families.

Since the emergence of civil constitutional administration; 1848 in Hungary; the National Museum has been supervised by one of the ministries of the national government; regularly ministries of culture or education. It was considered an autonomous institution governed by a board and maintained by an endowment; but also benefited from state sponsorship up until 1949; the introduction of communist dictatorship. During the 1870s; a professional system of collection was developed. Professional art historians were responsible for acquisitions funded mostly by the state; whereas archaeologists were employed and excavations were sponsored. This led to the rapid expansion of collections and the foundations of specialized museums at the turn of the century: Museum of Natural History; Museum of Ethnography; Museum of Applied Arts; Museum of Fine Arts; National Gallery.

These museums together created the system of the Hungarian National Museum under various titles; thus transforming the original National Museum into a historical museum; as it was actually called in certain periods. The structure of the National Museum included the National Library and Archives until the end of WWII. In 1949; the National Museum and all the other specialized museums became state owned; state funded individual museums. They lost their autonomous governance; and received annual central funds. This institutional structure virtually remained in effect following 1989. The network of national museums are supervised by the Ministry of Culture or Education and governed and funded by the state.

Building National Museums in Europe 1750-2010. Conference proceedings from EuNaMus; European National Museums: Identity Politics; the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen; Bologna 28-30 April 2011. EuNaMus Report No. 1

Author:
Péter Apor
Title:
National Museums in Hungary
References:

Aradi; N. (ed.) (1978) Muvészet és felvilågosodås: Muvészettörténeti tanulmånyok [Art and Enlightenment: Studies in the History of Art]; Budapest: Magyar Tudomånyos Akadémia Muvészettörténeti Kutató Csoportjånak kiadvånya.


Czobor; Á. (ed.) (1971) A SzĂ©pmuvĂ©szeti MĂșzeum [The Museum of Fine Arts]; Budapest: Corvina.


Entz; G. (1937) A magyar mugyujtĂ©s törtĂ©netĂ©nek vĂĄzlata 1850-ig [The Outline of the History of Hungarian Collection Activities until 1850]; Budapest: Author’s publication.


Fodor; I.; Kovalovszki; J.; KovĂĄcs; T.; Lovag Z. and TĂłth E. (1992) A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum [The Hungarian National Museum]; Budapest: Electa - Helikon.


Fejos; I. (1964) ‘A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum törtĂ©nete 1802-1847’ [The History of the Hungarian National Museum 1802-1847]; Folia Archaeologica 16: 267-281.


—— (1965) ‘A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum törtĂ©nete 1848-1944’ [The History of the Hungarian National Museum 1848-1944]; Folia Archaeologica 17: 285-301.


Fejos; I. and Korek; J. (1971) A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum törtĂ©nete [The History of the Hungarian National Museum]; Budapest: NĂ©pmuvelĂ©si Propaganda Iroda.


FĂŒlep; F. (ed.) (1977) A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum [The Hungarian National Museum]; Budapest: Corvina.


GaĂĄl; P. (1996) ‘A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum Ă©pĂŒletĂ©nek rekonstrukciĂłja’ [The Reconstruction of the Building of the Hungarian National Museum]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Autumn 1996): 6-10.


Gedai; I. (1996) ‘MĂșlt Ă©s jövo’ [Past and Future]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Autumn 1996): 3-5.


Gergely; A. A. (ed.) (2002) A nemzet antropolĂłgiĂĄja: Hofer TamĂĄs köszöntĂ©se [The Anthropology of the Nation]; Budapest: Új MandĂĄtum.


Hofer; T. (ed.) (1996) Magyarok Kelet Ă©s Nyugat közt: a nemzettudat vĂĄltozĂł jelkĂ©pei [Hungarians in Between East and West: Changing Symbols of National Identity]; Budapest: NĂ©prajzi MĂșzeum – Balassi.


IhĂĄsz; I. (1996) ‘A tĂșlĂ©lĂ©s Ă©vszĂĄzada (MagyarorszĂĄg 1900-1990)’ [The Century of Survival (Hungary 1900-1990)]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Autumn 1996): 40-42.


Kemenczei; Á. (1996)’ ”
megmentettem a Nemzeti MĂșzeumot
” Egy amerikai tĂĄbornok 1919-ben a Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeumĂ©rt’ [“
I saved the National Museum
”: An American General for the Hungarian National Museum]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Autumn 1996): 21-24.


Kerekes; A. et al. (eds) (2004) Leitha und Lethe: symbolische RĂ€ume und Zeiten in der Kultur Österreich-Ungarns; TĂŒbingen: Francke.


Kolba; J. (1996) ‘Az ĂĄllamalapĂ­tĂĄstĂłl a török kiuzĂ©sĂ©ig (XI-XVII. szĂĄzad)’ [From the Foundation of the State to the Driving Out of the Turks (11th-17th centuries)]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Autumn 1996): 36-38.


KollĂĄnyi; F. (1910) Az AkadĂ©mia Ă©s a Nemzeti MĂșzeum [The Academy and the National Museum]; Budapest: Magyar TudomĂĄnyos AkadĂ©mia.


Korek; J. (1965) ‘A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum törtĂ©nete 1945-1964’ [The History of the Hungarian National Museum 1945-1964]; Folia Archaeologica 17: 303-330.


ZoltĂĄn KorsĂłs – HorvĂĄth; C. (1996) ‘A Magyar TermĂ©szettudomĂĄnyi MĂșzeum rövid törtĂ©nete’ [A Brief History of the Hungarian Natural History Museum]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Winter 1996): 5-9.


KovĂĄcs; Á. (ed.) (1991) Monumentumok az elso hĂĄborĂșbĂłl [Monuments from the First Great War]; Budapest: Corvina.


Körmöczi; K. (1996) ‘A török hĂĄborĂșk vĂ©gĂ©tol a milleniumig (XVIII-XIX. szĂĄzad)’ [From the End of the Turkish Wars to the Millennium (18th-19th centuries)]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Autumn 1996): 38-40.


Lovag; Z. (1997) ‘SzĂĄz eves az IparmuvĂ©szeti MĂșzeum’ [The 100 Years Old Museum of Applied Arts]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 3 (Spring 1997): 41-43.


MĂĄnyi; I. (1996) ‘A Magyar TermĂ©szettudomĂĄnyi MĂșzeum ĂșjjĂĄszĂŒletĂ©se a Ludovika AkadĂ©mia Ă©pĂŒletĂ©ben’ [The Rebirth of the Hungarian Natural History Museum in the Building of the Ludoviceum]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Winter 1996): 10-12.


Museum Hungaricum: A Nemzeti Gyujtemények elintézése feltételei [The Conditions of Arrangement of the National Collections]; (Buda; 1807).


Pataky; D. (1996) ‘NyĂ­lt level SzĂ©chenyi Bertalan grĂłf Ășrhoz. Gondolatok egy kiĂĄllĂ­tĂĄs belsoĂ©pĂ­tĂ©szeti tervĂ©rol’ [Open Letter to Count Bertalan SzĂ©chenyi: Thoughts on the Interior Design of an Exhibition]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 2 (Autumn 1996): 33-35.


Rados; J. and Zådor; A. (1943) A klasszicizmus építészete Magyarorszågon [The Architecture of Classicism in Hungary]; Budapest: Magyar Tudomånyos Akadémia.


Selmeczi KovĂĄcs; A. (1997) ‘Fejezetek a NĂ©prajzi MĂșzeum törtĂ©netĂ©bol’ [Chapters in the History of the Museum of Ethnography]; Magyar MĂșzeumok 3 (Autumn 1997): 13-20.


Szalay; I. (1902) A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum alapĂ­tĂĄsa Ă©s fejlodĂ©se [The Foundation and Development of the Hungarian National Museum]; Budapest: HornyĂĄnszky Viktor csĂĄszĂĄri Ă©s kirĂĄlyi udvari könyvnyomdĂĄja.


Szinyei Merse; A. (ed.) (1993) Magyar Nemzeti Galéria [Hungarian National Gallery]; Budapest: Corvina.


ZĂĄdor; A. (1935) ÉpĂ­tĂ©szeti tervek a 18. szĂĄzadbĂłl [Architectural Plans from the 18th Century]; Budapest: Franklin; 1935.


—— (1961) A Magyar Nemzeti MĂșzeum [The Hungarian National Museum]; Budapest: KĂ©pzomuvĂ©szeti Alap KiadĂłvĂĄllalata.


—— (ed.) (1993) A historizmus muvĂ©szete MagyarorszĂĄgon: muvĂ©szettörtĂ©neti tanulmĂĄnyok [The Art of Historicism in Hungary: Studies in the History of Art]; Budapest: Magyar TudomĂĄnyos AkadĂ©mia MuvĂ©szettörtĂ©neti KutatĂł IntĂ©zet.

Building National Museums in Europe 1750-2010. Conference proceedings from EuNaMus; European National Museums: Identity Politics; the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen; Bologna 28-30 April 2011. EuNaMus Report No. 1

Author:
Péter Apor
Title:
National Museums in Hungary
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment