Article | The 48th Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and Modeling (SIMS 2007); 30-31 October; 2007; Göteborg (Särö) | Regularized; Stabilized; Variational Methods for Multibodies

Title:
Regularized; Stabilized; Variational Methods for Multibodies
Author:
Claude Lacoursière: HPC2N/Vrlab, Sweden \ Department of Computing Science, Umeå University, Sweden
Download:
Full text (pdf)
Year:
2007
Conference:
The 48th Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and Modeling (SIMS 2007); 30-31 October; 2007; Göteborg (Särö)
Issue:
027
Article no.:
005
Pages:
40-48
No. of pages:
9
Publication type:
Abstract and Fulltext
Published:
2007-12-21
Series:
Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
ISSN (print):
1650-3686
ISSN (online):
1650-3740
Publisher:
Linköping University Electronic Press; Linköpings universitet


Export in BibTex, RIS or text

A time-discrete formulation of the variational principle of mechanics is used to construct a novel first order; fixed time step integration method for multibody systems subject to mixed constraints. The new stepper; coined Spook; includes physics motivated constraint regularization and stabilization terms. The stepper is proved to be stable for the case of linear constraints; for non-zero regularization and stabilization parameters. For fixed stabilization value; the regularization can be made arbitrarily small; corresponding to arbitrarily stiff penalty forces. The “relaxed” constraint formulation permits a separation of time scales so that stiff forces are treated as relaxed constraints. Constraint stabilization makes the stiff forces modeled this way strictly dissipative; and thus; the stepper essentially filters out the high oscillations; but is rigorously symplectic for the rest of the motion. Spook solves a single linear system per time step and is insensitive to constraint degeneracies for non-zero regularization. In addition; it keeps the constraint violations within bounds of O(h2); where h is the time step. Because it is derived from the discrete variational principle; the stepping scheme globally preserves the symmetries of the physical system. The combination of these features make Spook a very good choice for interactive simulations. Numerical experiments on simple multibody systems are presented to demonstrate the performance and stability properties.

The 48th Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and Modeling (SIMS 2007); 30-31 October; 2007; Göteborg (Särö)

Author:
Claude Lacoursière
Title:
Regularized; Stabilized; Variational Methods for Multibodies
References:

[1] H. C. Andersen; RATTLE: A velocity versionof the SHAKE algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations; J. Comp. Phys.; 52 (1983); pp. 24–34.


[2] U. Ascher; H. Chin; L. Petzold; and S. Reich; Stabilization of constrained mechanical sys-tems with DAEs and invariant manifolds; Mech. Struct. & Mach.; 23 (1995); pp. 135–158.


[3] U. Ascher and P. Lin; Sequential regularization methods for nonlinear higher index DAEs; SIAM J. Scient. Comput; 18 (1997); pp. 160–181.


[4] ; Sequential regularization methods for simu- lating mechanical systems with many closed loops.; SIAM J. Scient. Comput.; 21 (1999); pp. 1244– 1262.


[5] J. Baumgarte; Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems; Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering; 1 (1972); pp. 1–16.


[6] F. A. Bornemann; Homogenization in Time of Singularly Perturbed Mechanical Systems; vol. 1687 of Lecture notes in mathematics; 0075- 8434; Springer; Berlin; 1998.


[7] V. N. Brendelev; On the realization of con- straints in nonholonomic mechanics; J. Appl. Math. Mech.; 45 (1981); pp. 481–487.


[8] J. Cort´es and S. Mart´inez; Non-holonomic in- tegrators; Nonlinearity; 14 (2001); pp. 1365–1392.


[9] T. A. Davis; Algorithm 832: UMFPACK— an unsymmetric-pattern multifrontal method; ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software; 30 (2004); pp. 196–199.


[10] J. W. Eaton; GNU Octave Manual; 2.9.12 ed.; 2007.


[11] R. E. Gillilan and K. R. Wilson; Shadowing; rare events; and rubber bands - a variational Ver- let algorithm for molecular-dynamics; J. Chem. Phys.; 97 (1992); pp. 1757–1772.


[12] R. Goldenthal; D. Harmon; R. Fattal; M. Bercovier; and E. Grinspun; Efficient simulation of inextensible cloth; in SIGGRAPH ’07: ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papers; New York; NY; USA; 2007; ACM Press; p. 49.


[13] E. Hairer; C. Lubich; and G. Wanner; Ge- ometric Numerical Integration; vol. 31 of Spring Series in Computational Mathematics; Springer- Verlag; Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; London; Paris; Tokyo; Hong Kong; 2001.


[14] E. Hairer and G. Wanner; Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II: Stiff and Differential Algebraic Problems; vol. 14 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics; Springer-Verlag; Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; London; Paris; Tokyo; Hong Kong; second revised edition ed.; 1996.


[15] C. Kane; J. E. Marsden; M. Ortiz; and M. West; Variational integrators and the New- mark algorithm for conservative and dissipative mechanical systems; International Journal forNumerical Methods in Engineering; 49 (2000); p p. 1295–1325.


[16] A. V. Karapetian; On realizing nonholonomic constraints by viscous friction forces and Celtic stones stability; J. Appl. Math. Mech.; 45 (1981); pp. 42–51.


[17] A. J. Kurdila and F. J. Narcowich; Sufficient conditions for penalty formulation methods in an- alytical dynamics; Computational Mechanics; 12 (1993); pp. 81–96.


[18] C. Lacoursi`ere; Ghosts and Machines: Regu- larized Variational Methods for Interactive Sim- ulations of Multibodies with Dry Frictional Con-tacts; PhD thesis; Department of Computing Science; Ume°a University; Sweden; SE-901 87; Ume°a; Sweden; June 2007.


[19] C. Lanczos; The Variational Pinciples of Mechanics; Dover Publications; New York; fourth ed.; 1986.


[20] B. Leimkuhler and S. Reich; Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics; vol. 14 of Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics; Cambridge University Press; Cambridge; 2004.


[21] C. Lubich; C. Engstler; U. Nowak; and U. P¨ohle; Numerical integration of constrained mechanical systems using MEXX; Mech. Struct. & Mach.; 23 (1995); pp. 473–497.


[22] J. E. Marsden and M. West; Discrete mechan- ics and variational integrators; Acta Numer.; 10 (2001); pp. 357–514.


[23] H. Rubin and P. Ungar; Motion under a strong constraining force; Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics; X (1957); pp. 65–87.


[24] J.-P. Ryckaert; G. Ciccotti; and H. J. C. Bendersen; Numerical integration of the Carte- sian equations of motion of a system with con- straints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes; J. Comp. Phys.; 23 (1977); pp. 327–341. shake.


[25] L. Verlet; Computer “experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard- Jones molecules.; Phys. Rev.; 159 (1967); pp. 98– 103.

The 48th Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and Modeling (SIMS 2007); 30-31 October; 2007; Göteborg (Särö)

Author:
Claude Lacoursière
Title:
Regularized; Stabilized; Variational Methods for Multibodies
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment